Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
|
x
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from
to
Commission
File Number: 72870
SONIC
SOLUTIONS
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
California
|
|
93-0925818
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
7250
Redwood Boulevard, Suite 300
Novato,
California
|
|
94945
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
415-893-8000
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act: None
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common
Stock, no par value
|
|
The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one).
Large
accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated
filer x Non-accelerated
filer ¨ Smaller
reporting company ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The
aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant
(based upon the closing sale price on The Nasdaq Global Select Market on
September 30, 2009) was approximately $141.0 million. Shares held by
each executive officer, director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the
outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed
to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not
necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
The
number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common Stock on June 3, 2010
was 30,636,131.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None
SONIC
SOLUTIONS
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
PART
I
|
|
|
|
Additional
Information
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
Looking Information
|
3
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
|
Business
|
3
|
|
|
|
Item
1A.
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
9
|
|
|
|
Item
1B.
|
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
18
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
|
Properties
|
19
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
19
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
|
Item
5.
|
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
20
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
22
|
|
|
|
Item
7.
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item
7A.
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
39
|
|
|
|
Item
8.
|
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
41
|
|
|
|
Item
9.
|
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
68
|
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
68
|
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
Other
Information
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
III
|
|
Item
10.
|
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
70
|
|
|
|
Item
11.
|
|
Executive
Compensation
|
73
|
|
|
|
Item
12.
|
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
86
|
|
|
|
Item
13.
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
Independence
|
87
|
|
|
|
Item
14.
|
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
89
|
PART
I
Additional
Information
References
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) to the “Company,” “Sonic,”
“it,” or “its” mean Sonic Solutions together with its subsidiaries, except where
the context otherwise requires. Quantities or results referred to as
“to date” or “as of this date” mean as of or to March 31, 2010, unless otherwise
specifically noted. References to “FY” or “fiscal year” refer to the
Company’s fiscal year ending on March 31 of the designated year. For
example, “FY 2010” and “fiscal year 2010” each refer to the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2010. Other references to “years” mean calendar
years. This Annual Report includes references to certain Company
trademarks and registered trademarks. Products or service names of
other companies mentioned in this Annual Report may be trademarks or registered
trademarks of their respective owners.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Annual Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the
actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause such differences
include, but are not limited to: the continuing negative impact of
current macroeconomic conditions on consumers and associated impact on their
ability and inclination to spend on leisure and entertainment-related activities
and related software and electronics; the Company’s ability to adapt to rapid
changes in technology and consumer preferences, and to cost-effectively develop
and introduce new and enhanced products and services; competitive pressures on
the Company’s products and services, both from large established competitors
with greater technological and financial resources than the Company possesses,
and from smaller companies that are able to compete effectively through low-cost
Internet sales of their software products and services; changes in operating
results, requirements or business models of the Company’s original equipment
manufacturer (“OEM”) or other major customers; the Company’s ability to
successfully introduce and profitably run its RoxioNow initiative, a business
with which it has had limited experience, which is dependent on third parties
for premium content selection and delivery services, and which may give rise to
legal exposure and other business risks; expenses and issues associated with
qualifying and supporting the Company’s products on multiple computer platforms
and in developing products and services designed to comply with industry
standards; issues impacting third parties who supply the Company with services
and operate its web store, as well as retailers, resellers and distributors of
its products and services; risks associated with international operations,
including risks related to currency fluctuations, as well as to the Company’s
extensive software development work in China; changes in product and service
offerings that could cause the Company to defer the recognition of revenue,
thereby harming operating results; the Company’s ability to maintain sufficient
liquidity and continue to fund capital needs; the loss of key management
personnel; risks related to the proposed merger with DivX, Inc. (“DivX”),
including (i) the parties may not obtain the requisite shareholder or regulatory
approvals for the transaction; (ii) the anticipated benefits of the transaction
may not be realized; (iii) the parties may not be able to retain key personnel;
(iv) the conditions to the closing of the transaction may not be satisfied or
waived; and (v) the impact of general economic conditions on the businesses and
results of operations of the two companies; risks related to acquisition and
integration of acquired businesses, assets, personnel and systems generally;
costs associated with litigation, patent prosecution, intellectual property and
other claims; changes in effective tax rates; and earthquakes, natural disasters
and other unexpected events. Factors that could cause actual results
or conditions to differ from those anticipated by forward-looking statements
include those more fully described below under Item 1, “Business,” Item 1A,
“Risk Factors,” and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Annual
Report. All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report
are based on information available to the Company as of the date of filing of
this Annual Report, and the Company assumes no obligation to revise or publicly
release any revision to any such forward-looking statement, except as may
otherwise be required by law.
Item
1. Business
General
The
Company is a leading developer of products and services that enable the
creation, management, and enjoyment of digital media content across a wide
variety of technology platforms. The Company’s products and services
offer innovative technologies to consumers, OEMs, businesses, high-end
professional optical disc authoring experts and developers. The
Company distributes its products and services through retailers and
distributors, personal computer (“PC”) and consumer electronics (“CE”) OEMs,
Internet websites including www.roxio.com, and other channels. The
Company also licenses core technology and intellectual property to other
software companies and technology manufacturers for integration into their own
products and services. Sonic software is intended for use with a wide
range of PC and CE operating systems, development environments, and proprietary
platforms.
Sonic
products and services are used to accomplish a wide variety of tasks, including
creating and distributing digital audio and video content in a variety of
formats; renting, purchasing and enjoying Hollywood movies and other premium
content; producing digital media photo and video shows for sharing online and
via television, PCs and CE devices; recording and playback of digital content on
DVD, Blu-ray Disc (“BD”), other storage media and portable devices; managing
digital media on PCs and CE devices; and backing up and preserving digital
information, both to local storage devices and on the Internet.
The
Company was incorporated in California in 1986 and completed its initial public
offering in 1994. Its principal executive headquarters are located at
7250 Redwood Blvd., Suite 300, Novato, California 94945. Its
telephone number is (415) 893-8000, and its corporate web address is
www.sonic.com.
Proposed
Acquisition of DivX
On June
1, 2010, the Company and DivX entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the
“Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which DivX and the Company will combine their
businesses through the merger of DivX with a newly formed, wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company (the “DivX Acquisition”). At the effective time of
the DivX Acquisition (the “Effective Time”), each share of DivX common stock
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted
into the right to receive 0.514 shares of the Company’s common stock and $3.75
in cash. The Merger Agreement contains customary representations,
warranties and covenants of the Company and DivX including, among others,
covenants (1) to use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct their respective
businesses in the ordinary course during the interim period between the
execution of the Merger Agreement and consummation of the DivX Acquisition, (2)
not to engage in specified types of transactions during such period, and (3) not
to solicit proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions
or, subject to specified exceptions, enter into discussions or provide
confidential information in connection with proposals for alternative business
combination transactions.
The
Company’s and DivX’s obligations to consummate the DivX Acquisition are subject
to the satisfaction or waiver of customary conditions, including (1) requisite
approvals of their respective shareholders, (2) the absence of any law or order
prohibiting the consummation of the DivX Acquisition, (3) the declaration by the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) of the effectiveness of the
registration statement relating to the shares of Sonic Solutions common stock to
be issued to DivX stockholders pursuant to the Merger Agreement, (4) the
expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and (5) the
absence of any material adverse effect with respect to either party during the
interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and consummation of
the DivX Acquisition. In addition, each party’s
obligation to consummate the DivX Acquisition is subject to other specified
customary conditions, including (a) the accuracy of the representations and
warranties of the other party, subject to an overall material adverse effect
qualification, and (b) material compliance by the other party with its
covenants.
The
Merger Agreement provides each of the Company and DivX with specified
termination rights. If the Merger Agreement is terminated under
circumstances specified in the Merger Agreement, DivX will be required to pay
the Company a termination fee of $8.35 million. See Item 1A, “Risk
Factors” for a discussion of the risks associated with our failure to close the
DivX Acquisition and factors that impact our ability to successfully integrate
DivX’s operations into our existing business.
Operating
Segments
The
Company differentiates between digital media content that is created by
consumers (sometimes referred to herein as “personal” content) and digital
content that is professionally created for mass consumption (sometimes referred
to herein as “premium” content). Accordingly, the Company organizes
its business into two reportable operating segments targeted at these different
forms of content: the “Roxio Consumer Products” segment, which offers
products and services related to personal content, and the “Premium Content”
segment, which offers products and services related to premium
content. These segments reflect the Company’s internal organizational
structure, as well as the processes by which management makes operating
decisions, allocates resources and assesses performance.
Roxio
Consumer Products Segment
The Roxio
Consumer Products segment creates software and services that enable consumers to
easily create, manage, and share personal digital media content on and across a
broad range of connected devices. A wide array of leading technology
companies and developers rely on Roxio products, services and technologies to
bring innovative digital media functionality to PCs and next-generation CE
devices and platforms. The Roxio Consumer Products segment offers
products and services under a variety of names, including BackonTrack, Backup
MyPC, CinePlayer, Crunch, Easy LP to MP3, Easy VHS to DVD, Just!Burn, MyDVD,
MyTV To Go, PhotoShow, PhotoSuite, Popcorn, RecordNow, Roxio Burn, Roxio Copy
& Convert, Roxio Creator, Toast, VideoWave, WinOnCD, and
others. These products are sold in a number of different versions and
languages. The Company distributes these products through various
channels, including “bundling” arrangements with OEMs, volume licensing
programs, its web store, and third party web-based and “bricks and mortar”
retail stores. The Company also markets the core technology that
powers Roxio products to other companies who wish to build their own PC software
products.
Sales
and Distribution; Markets
Most
Roxio products are sold in a number of different versions and
languages. The Company distributes Roxio products through various
channels, including “bundling” arrangements with OEMs, volume licensing
programs, its web store, and third party web-based and “bricks and mortar”
retail stores. The Company also markets the core technology that
powers Roxio products to other companies who wish to build their own PC software
products.
OEM
Bundling
A primary
channel for the Company’s Roxio applications software is the inclusion or
“bundling” of the Company’s products with compatible products sold by
OEMs. The Company believes that most consumers first become exposed
to digital media software when they purchase a new PC or a CE device, such as a
mobile phone, and begin to use the software that comes bundled with the PC or CE
device. Some of these new users later add to their software
capabilities via upgrades or add-ons, in many cases through web transactions or
purchases at retail locations.
The
Company’s OEM customers include Roxio software as a value-added offering for
their customers and often pay the Company a royalty on each copy of the software
shipped with their products. Typically the royalty paid is only a
small fraction of the retail price for the Company’s software. The
Company enters into bundling arrangements because they generate revenue for the
Company as well as create a large installed base of customers to whom it can
sell upgraded, enhanced or different versions of its products and
services. Many of the Company’s bundle deals permit it to capture
customer registrations or to invite the customer to click-through to the
www.roxio.com web site where it can offer additional products for sale
directly.
The
Company also has non-traditional bundling programs with some of its OEM
customers, under which the Company reduces or eliminates the royalty due to it
when a copy of its product is shipped by the OEM. In return the OEM
actively promotes the purchase of an enhanced version of the bundled product,
either at “point of sale” (that is, the point at which end-user customers
purchase a PC or other device) or after point of sale. The resulting
revenues are split between the Company and the OEM.
The
Company usually does not provide end-user support as part of its bundling
arrangements, instead relying on OEMs to support the end-user
customers. The Company typically does provide “second line” support
to OEMs to back up their “first line” support of the Company’s products to their
consumer customers.
The
Company maintains an engineering and delivery staff that concentrates on
OEMs. OEM customers tend to be very sensitive to product quality and
stability, and usually are focused on providing their end-user customers with a
simple and trouble-free experience. They often demand significant
customization of Roxio products to meet their particular
requirements. OEMs, particularly those with high volume businesses,
require strict adherence to the release schedules of their product
lines.
Volume
Licensing
The
Company licenses Roxio applications software for use by corporate and
institutional organizations on populations of in-house computing
devices. In many ways, volume licensing resembles the Company’s OEM
business: there is a single point of sale for a large number of
copies of its software; the price per copy is usually set at a significant
discount from retail price; often a single copy of its software is provided that
the volume license customer then replicates for internal
deployment. Volume license customers also tend to be highly focused
on product quality and stability as well as on a simple and trouble-free user
experience.
Web
Store
The
Company makes its products available through web-based retail sites in North
America, Europe and Japan. These retail sites are operated by third
party resellers. Under these arrangements, the Company’s reseller
partners typically maintain Company-branded sites, provide the infrastructure to
handle secure purchase transactions, and deliver the product (whether via web
download or physical fulfillment). The Company’s web store sales
constituted approximately 23%, 22% and 22% of total net revenues for fiscal
years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For additional information
see Note 6, “Significant Customer Information, Segment Reporting and Geographic
Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual
Report.
Retail
Channel
The
Company distributes Roxio products through a large number of traditional
physical retail stores as well as catalog and web stores. The Company
promotes its products in the retail channel through a variety of techniques,
including rebates, advertising in targeted publications, numerous trade show
appearances, web promotions, direct mail and e-mail, press and publicity tours
and events. The Company’s retail products are often distributed
through distributors. These distributors handle inventory, shipment
to particular retail locations, and product returns and stock rotation as
required by the Company’s retail resellers.
Technology
Licensing
The
Company also markets the core technology that powers Roxio products to other
companies who wish to build their own PC software products. The
Company often markets this technology under the AuthorScript and CinePlayer
brand names. The Company packages this software with an “application
programmer’s interface”; that is, a software interface that enables other
companies’ software engineers to access the Company’s processing technology and
easily integrate it with their own software applications. The
Company’s technology licenses have a variety of
structures: (i) software bundling type arrangements in which it
receives a royalty on every unit of its software shipped; (ii) annual or
one-time license fees; (iii) custom development work for which the Company
receives payment, and (iv) broad development relationships through which
the license partner receives source-level access and rights to participate with
the Company in one or more of its ongoing development programs.
Manufacturing
and Suppliers
The
Company outsources the manufacture of its Roxio products for physical delivery
through retail and web store channels. HP Software Publishing is
currently the Company’s primary supplier providing services such as parts
procurement, parts warehousing, product assembly and supply chain
services. These services are provided to the Company from two primary
HP locations: Andover, Massachusetts, servicing North America; and
Galway, Ireland, servicing Europe. Production services and supply
chain logistics for Asia and the Pacific Rim are serviced by ModusLink,
Taipei. HP and ModusLink are non-exclusive suppliers.
The
Company selects its suppliers based on their ability to provide high quality,
responsive service, competitive costs and the capacity to scale up volumes as
necessary to meet Company’s product launches and seasonality
requirements. The Company’s supply chain vendors produce the finished
goods, generate the required shipping and receiving documents, and provide
return goods documentation and reconciliation services.
Competitive
Environment
The
market for the Company’s Roxio consumer products and services is very
competitive. A number of large and small companies produce video
editors, photo editors, backup solutions and other products and services that
compete with those of the Company’s. The Company’s digital media
products, including optical disc playback, authoring and video editing, are in
direct competition for strategic relationships with PC and CE OEMs, software
companies, online services companies and technical developers. Many
of the Company’s competitors have greater technical and financial resources than
the Company does. Some of the Company’s products and services provide
features and technical capabilities that are generally comparable to higher
priced products offered by larger competitors.
Segment
Information
The Roxio
Consumer Products segment accounted for approximately 86% of net revenue for
fiscal year 2010. See Note 6, “Significant Customer Information,
Segment Reporting and Geographic Information,” to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Annual Report for a summary of the Company’s
financial data by business segment, geography and customer
concentration.
Premium
Content Segment
The
Premium Content segment offers a range of products and services related to the
creation, distribution and enjoyment of premium content. As part of
this segment, the Company also sells, rents and distributes premium
entertainment content to consumers over the Internet under RoxioNow branding (in
this Annual Report, this service may be referred to as the “RoxioNow
Service”). Also within this segment, the Professional Products Group
offers software under the Scenarist, CineVision, and DVDit product names as well
as under the Sonic and Roxio Professional brands to major motion picture
studios, high-end authoring houses and other professional
customers. The Company also develops software components that it
licenses to CE companies to enable their devices to offer premium content to
consumers, and licenses intellectual property, including patents.
RoxioNow
Service
The
Company has partnered with major retailers such as Best Buy and Blockbuster,
offering its RoxioNow Internet delivery platform for the sell-through or rental
of premium content. The RoxioNow Service library contains thousands
of digital assets, including content from 20th Century
Fox, Walt Disney Co., DreamWorks Animation SKG, MGM, Miramax, NBC Universal,
Sony, Warner Bros. and Lions Gate Entertainment, which content includes major
Hollywood hits, feature-length films, television episodes, short films, and
music concerts. This premium content is available for electronic
sell-through (“EST” or download to own), rental (video-on-demand or “VOD” ) and
DVD burning using Qflix technology.
Professional
Products
The
Professional Product Group develops, sells, and supports a range of
comprehensive authoring solutions that enable commercial content owners such as
major Hollywood motion picture studios to create and distribute high-end
commercially released digital media titles in DVD, BD and other formats to mass
consumer markets worldwide. The Company’s professional products
include its Scenarist branded high-end authoring applications, its Scenarist
Publisher template-based authoring solutions, CineVision encoding systems, and
easy-to-use DVDit and DVDit Pro HD authoring solutions. The Company’s
professional software solutions support video and audio encoding, authoring,
playback emulation, multiplexing (combining navigation programming with content
elements to produce finished disc images), and automated, customizable workflow
processing.
Qflix
The
Company offers its Qflix intellectual property and technology licensing program
for the application of Content Scrambling Systems (“CSS”) to recordable
DVD. CSS is the standard protection mechanism used in essentially all
DVD players and on the majority of commercial, replicated DVDs. The
Qflix program provides branding and certification for CSS recordable drives, CSS
recordable media, and related components, and licenses key
patents. The Qflix program enables content owners to manufacture and
deliver industry-standard copy-protected DVDs directly to consumers on demand
replacing the traditional costs associated with DVD manufacturing, distribution
and inventory with internet distribution, which can be located in retail
establishments, or on a consumer’s PC or set-top box, as well as other
manufacturing facilities. Under the Qflix program, retailers and
content owners are able to make a broader selection of DVD titles available to
consumers without having to manage a large stock of physical inventory, and
consumers are able to create their own personal DVDs of premium content at
home.
Technology
Licensing
The
Company licenses its technology to CE device manufacturers, including companies
that make the integrated circuits used by equipment
manufacturers. The customers and agreements for this business are
similar to those for the technology licensing business engaged in by the Company
through its Roxio consumer segment.
Patent
Program
The
Premium Content segment also includes the Company’s patent management and
commercialization program. Under the patent program the Company
identifies patentable ideas that arise in the course of its internal development
operations, assesses and acquires patents as part of its business acquisitions,
and assesses and may acquire patents and patent portfolios from other companies,
although it has not made an acquisition of separate patents or patent portfolios
to date. The Company’s patent program is designed to generate
revenues by granting limited licenses to patents directly to other companies or
consortia, licensing the use of patents in connection with licenses of its
applications software or software technology, including patents in patent pools
associated with industry standard formats, and selling or licensing patents to
other companies for exploitation. Under appropriate circumstances and
in order to protect its intellectual property, the Company may bring legal
proceedings against third parties who infringe its patents.
Sales
and Distribution; Markets
The
Company sells its professional products through a field sales force in
combination with a network of specialized professional audio/video
dealers. As of March 31, 2010, the Company employed 18 people in its
field sales organization for Premium Content professional
products. Sales personnel are based in the Company’s headquarters in
Novato, CA as well as its offices in Santa Clara, CA, Burbank, CA, London,
England and Tokyo, Japan. The Company’s professional products are
mainly sold to the high-end film and video post-production facilities that
process and prepare audio, video and film content for delivery across a variety
of broadcast, broadband and mobile playback platforms. The titles
authored by its professional customers consist primarily of major feature film,
entertainment, and educational programs as well as business-to-business and
business-to-consumer content. The Company’s professional customers
range in size from relatively small organizations with few employees to major
content creation facilities with thousands of employees.
The
Company offers its RoxioNow Service directly through websites and, increasingly,
through third party partners who offer the service through their own websites,
through PCs and through CE devices. To the extent that the Company
offers the RoxioNow Service through PC and CE OEMs, its distribution
relationships are similar to, and often overlap with, the OEM relationships that
it establishes through the Roxio consumer segment.
Competitive
Environment
A number
of companies offer products and services that compete with some or all of the
Company’s premium product and service offerings. The Company’s
RoxioNow Service, in particular, faces a wide range of competition from other
companies seeking to position themselves strategically as the digital
distribution of Hollywood movies and other premium content grows in scope and
importance. Significant competition exists from well-established
traditional premium content distribution channels, including retailers that
rent, sell or trade DVDs and games, cable and satellite VOD services, and other
in-home entertainment. Consumers have a variety of vendor choices and
multiple distribution options for premium content consumption, and the Company
believes that this competition will increase over the coming years as the
proliferation of digital delivery continues. Some of the Company’s
competitors have greater financial or organizational resources and/or greater
familiarity than the Company does with certain technologies.
Segment
Information
The
Premium Content segment accounted for approximately 14% of net revenue for
fiscal year 2010. See Note 6, “Significant Customer Information,
Segment Reporting and Geographic Information,” to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Annual Report for a summary of the Company’s
financial data by business segment, geography and customer
concentration.
General
Business Factors
The
matters described in this section apply generally to the Company’s business
activities, including both of its operating segments.
Intellectual
Property
The
Company protects its proprietary rights through a variety of means and measures,
including patents, trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, contractual
restrictions and technical measures. The Company generally offers its
products and services subject to purchase and license agreements that restrict
unauthorized disclosure of its proprietary software and designs, or copying for
purposes other than the use intended when the product is sold.
The
Company owns or licenses many patents and has a number of patent applications
pending in the United States and foreign countries. The status of
software and business method patent protection has been in flux. On
the one hand, there has recently been a trend on the part of patent authorities
to grant patents in audio and video processing techniques and, in particular,
for software based techniques, with increasing liberality. On the
other hand, there has been an increasing tendency on the part of some courts to
invalidate patents granted by the patent authorities (for example, in the case
of KSR v. Teleflex
(April 2007), the U.S. Supreme Court enunciated a new standard of “obviousness”
that may call into question many patents granted under the recent, liberal
patent regime). Given the general confusion and imprecision in this
area, the Company believes that it is possible that some of its present or
future products or services might be found to infringe issued or yet to be
issued patents, and it is almost certain that the Company will be asked by
patent holders to respond to infringement claims. If such patents
were held to be valid, and if they covered a portion of the Company’s technology
for which there was no ready substitute, the Company might suffer significant
market and financial losses.
The
Company has endeavored to reduce its risk to some extent by means of contractual
provisions. For example, in the case of low revenue-per-copy bundling
agreements with OEM customers, the Company typically attempts to limit any
indemnity it provides relating to infringement. However, not all of
the Company’s OEM customers are willing to agree to the terms that the Company
seeks, and, even if they agree, there is no assurance that such limitations will
in fact reduce the Company’s exposure to liability.
The
Company relies to a great extent on the protection the law gives to trade
secrets to protect its proprietary technology. The Company policy is
to request confidentiality agreements from all of its employees and key
consultants, and it regularly enters into confidentiality agreements with other
companies with whom the Company discusses its proprietary technology, financial
issues, business opportunities and other confidential
matters. Despite trade secret protection, the Company cannot be
certain that third parties will not independently develop the same or similar
technologies, or whether third parties will improperly disclose or use Company
technologies.
Seasonal
Trends
The
Company’s software product sales have historically followed a seasonal trend,
with sales being typically higher in the December and March
quarters. Due to adverse global economic conditions, this normal
seasonality was not pronounced during fiscal years 2009 and
2010.
Research
and Development
The
Company’s research and development staff is located principally at its
headquarters in Novato and Santa Clara, California, and in Shanghai and
Hangzhou, China, as well as San Luis Obispo, California and Wayne,
Pennsylvania. The Company typically hires research and development
personnel with backgrounds in digital audio signal processing, digital video
image processing, distributed networking and computer systems
design. For information regarding research and development expenses,
see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations,” included in this Annual Report.
Employees
As of
March 31, 2010, the Company had approximately 490 full-time
employees. The total included 99 employees engaged in sales and
marketing, 290 engaged in research and development and the remaining 101 engaged
in general and administration. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had
approximately 229 employees in North America, 16 employees in Europe, and 245
employees in Asia. The Company believes that its future success will
depend in large part on its ability to attract and retain highly skilled
technical, managerial, and sales and marketing personnel. None of the
employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. The
Company believes relations with employees are good.
Available
Information
The
Company’s corporate website is www.sonic.com. The Company makes
available free of charge, on or through its website, this Annual Report,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and previous annual reports on Form 10-K,
current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, if any, and any
other filings filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or
furnishing these reports with the SEC. Information contained on any
of the Company’s websites is not a part of this Annual Report.
The
Company files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. You may inspect and copy these materials at
the Public Reference Room maintained by the Commission at Room 100 F Street,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330
for more information on the Public Reference Room. The SEC also
maintains a website at www.sec.gov that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers, such as the Company, that file electronically with the
SEC.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
The
following are certain risk factors that could affect the Company’s business,
financial results and results of operations and its stock
price. These risk factors should be considered in connection with
evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report
because these factors could cause the actual results and conditions to differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. You should carefully consider the following risk factors
as well as those in other documents the Company files with the
SEC. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only
ones the Company may face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to the Company or that it currently deems immaterial may also
impair its business operations.
Adverse
global economic conditions may continue to negatively affect the Company’s
business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Adverse
global economic conditions have had, and may continue to have, a negative impact
on consumers and limit their ability and inclination to spend on leisure and
entertainment related products and services. If demand for the
Company’s products and services further decreases, as a result of economic
conditions or otherwise, the Company’s financial condition would be adversely
impacted.
The
recent financial downturn and continuing financial market volatility may
continue to negatively affect the Company’s business, results of operations, and
financial condition.
The
recent global economic downturn and continuing financial market volatility have
resulted in tight credit markets, a low level of liquidity in many financial
markets, and extreme volatility in fixed income, credit and equity
markets. These factors could lead to a number of follow-on effects on
the Company’s business, including insolvency of key suppliers resulting in
product delays; inability of customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of
the Company’s products and services; increased expense or inability to obtain
financing for the Company’s operations or other business plans.
The
Company was not profitable in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, and there can be
no assurance that the Company will generate net income in future
periods.
The
Company experienced net losses for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, and there
can be no assurance that the Company will be cash flow positive or generate net
income in fiscal year 2011 or future years.
Rapid
changes in technology and consumer preferences may adversely affect the
Company’s operating results.
The
market for the Company’s products and services is characterized by rapid
technological change. The Company may not accurately predict customer
or business partner behavior and may not recognize or respond to emerging
trends, changing preferences or competitive factors. The Company’s
operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of
factors, many of which are outside its control. These factors
include:
|
|
·
|
fluctuations
in demand for, and sales of, the Company’s products and
services;
|
|
|
·
|
introduction
of new products and services by the Company or its
competitors;
|
|
|
·
|
competitive
pressures that result in pricing
fluctuations;
|
|
|
·
|
variations
in the timing of orders for and shipments of the Company
products;
|
|
|
·
|
changes
in the mix of products and services that the Company sells and the
resulting impact on its gross
margins;
|
|
|
·
|
changes
in the terms of the Company’s licensing, distribution and other
agreements;
|
|
|
·
|
costs
associated with litigation and intellectual property claims;
and
|
|
|
·
|
general
adverse economic and financial market conditions as noted above in these
risks.
|
The
Company’s operating expenses are based on its current expectations of its future
revenues and are relatively fixed in the short term. Customer
purchasing behavior can be difficult to forecast, and if the Company has lower
revenues than expected, it may not be able to quickly reduce its expenses in
response. As a consequence, the Company’s operating results for a
particular quarter could be adversely impacted.
The
Company must develop and introduce new and enhanced products in a timely manner
to remain competitive.
To
compete successfully in the markets in which the Company operates, it must
develop and sell new or enhanced products and services that provide increasingly
higher levels of performance and reliability. As new industry
standards, technologies and formats are introduced, there may be limited sources
for the intellectual property rights and background technologies necessary for
implementation, and the initial prices that the Company may negotiate in an
effort to bring its products and services to market may prove to be higher than
those ultimately offered to other licensees, putting the Company at a
competitive disadvantage. Further, if new formats and technologies
prove to be unsuccessful or are not accepted for any reason, there may be
limited demand for the Company’s products or services. The products
and services that the Company is currently developing or intends to develop may
not achieve feasibility or be accepted by the market, and if the Company is
unable to recover the costs associated with its research and development
activities, it may adversely impact the Company’s business, financial condition
and results of operations.
The
Company relies on distributors, resellers and retailers to sell its products,
and disruptions to these channels would affect adversely the Company’s ability
to generate revenues from the sale of its products.
The
Company sells its retail consumer software to end-users via retail channels
through its network of distributors and resellers, and relies on two
distributors for a significant portion of sales. Any decrease in
revenue from these distributors or the loss of one of these distributors and the
Company’s inability to find a satisfactory replacement in a timely manner could
negatively impact its operating results.
Moreover,
the Company’s failure to maintain favorable arrangements with its distributors
and resellers may adversely impact its business. For example, the
Company’s distributors and resellers and the retailers who sell the Company’s
software to the public also sell products offered by the Company’s
competitors. If the Company’s competitors offer its distributors,
resellers or retailers more favorable terms, those distributors, resellers or
retailers may de-emphasize, fail to recommend or decline to carry the Company
products. If Company’s distributors, resellers or retailers attempt
to reduce their levels of inventory or if they do not maintain sufficient levels
to meet customer demand, the Company’s sales could be impacted
negatively. Further, if the Company reduces the prices of its
products, the Company may have to compensate its distributors, resellers or
retailers for the difference between the higher price they paid to buy their
inventory and the new lower prices of the Company’s products. In
addition, the Company is exposed to the risk of product returns from
distributors, resellers or retailers through their exercise of contractual
return rights. If direct sales to customers through the Company’s
web-based channels increase, the Company’s distributors, resellers and retailers
may suffer decreased sales as a consequence. These changes may cause
the Company’s distributors, resellers or retailers to cease distribution of its
products or seek more favorable terms, either of which could seriously harm the
Company’s business.
Because
many of the Company’s products are designed to comply with industry standards,
to the extent the Company cannot distinguish its products from those produced by
its competitors, its current distributors and customers may choose alternate
products or choose to purchase products from multiple vendors. The
Company may be unable to compete effectively if it cannot produce products more
quickly or at lower cost than its competitors.
The
Company cannot provide any assurance that the industry standards for which the
Company develops new products will allow it to compete effectively with
companies possessing greater financial and technological resources than the
Company has to market, promote and exploit sales opportunities as they arise in
the future. Products that are designed to comply with standards may
be viewed as interchangeable commodities by certain customers. The
Company may be unable to compete effectively if it cannot produce products more
quickly or at lower cost than its competitors. Further, any new
products developed may not be introduced in a timely manner or in advance of the
Company’s competitors’ products and may not achieve the broad market acceptance
necessary to generate significant revenues.
The
Company’s business depends on sales of consumer products and services, which
subject it to risks relating to, among other things, changing consumer demands
and increased competition.
The
Company’s business depends on sales of consumer products and services,
subjecting it to risks associated with changing consumer demands and extensive
competition. The Company’s ability to succeed in consumer markets
depends upon its ability to enhance its existing offerings, introduce new
competitive products and services, and minimize the impact of sudden price
decreases. The Company sells its consumer products through bundling
arrangements with OEM customers, through its web store, and through physical and
web-based retail channels. The Company may not have the resources or
expertise to continue to develop and exploit these distribution channels
effectively. Additionally, some of the Company’s non-OEM revenue
opportunities are fragmented and take more time and effort to establish and
maintain. Also, some of the Company’s competitors have well
established retail distribution capabilities and existing brands with market
acceptance that provide them with a significant competitive
advantage. If the Company is not successful in overcoming these
challenges, its business and results of operations may be adversely
impacted.
Because
a large portion of the Company’s revenue is from OEM customers, sales of its
products are tied to OEM product sales.
A
substantial portion of the Company’s revenue is derived from sales through OEM
customers who bundle copies of its software with their
products. Temporary fluctuations in the pricing and availability of
the OEM customers’ products could negatively impact sales of Company products,
which could in turn harm its business, financial condition and results of
operations. Moreover, sales of Company OEM products depend in large
part on consumer acceptance and purchase of DVD players, BD players, DVD
recorders, television sets and other digital media devices marketed by the
Company’s OEM customers in PCs, CE devices, or on a stand-alone
basis. Consumer acceptance of these digital media devices depends
significantly on the price and ease of use of these devices, among other
factors. If the demand for these devices is impaired, the Company’s
OEM sales will suffer a corresponding decline.
The
Company sells its products to OEMs pursuant to individual supplements or other
attachments to standard terms and conditions the Company has negotiated with
each of these customers. These terms and conditions include
provisions relating to the delivery of Company products, the customer’s
distribution of these products, representations by the Company with respect to
the quality of the products and its ownership of the products, its obligations
to comply with law, confidentiality obligations, and indemnifications by the
Company. The agreements are non-exclusive and do not contain any
minimum purchase obligations or similar commitments. The underlying
agreements generally renew for one year periods, subject to annual termination
by either party or termination for breach and, in certain cases, the ability to
terminate without cause with no or short notice. Under each
agreement, the customer has the sole discretion to decide whether to purchase
any of the Company products. Although the Company has maintained
relationships with many of its OEMs for many years, if an OEM agreement with a
major customer were terminated and the Company was unable to replace such
relationship, its business and results of operations would suffer.
In
addition, the Company relies on reports prepared by OEM customers to determine
the results of sales of products through these OEM customers. If the
OEM customers prepare inaccurate or substandard sales reports, the Company may
be required to take corrective actions, including auditing current and prior
reports. Such corrective actions may result in a negative impact on
its business or reported results.
Changes
in requirements or business models of the Company’s OEM customers may affect
negatively its financial results.
OEM
customers can be demanding with respect to the features they demand in software
products they bundle, quality and testing requirements, and economic
terms. Because there are a relatively small number of significant OEM
customers, if they demand reduced prices, the Company may not be in a position
to refuse such demands, which would adversely impact revenues and results of
operations. If particular OEMs demand products or product features
that the Company is unable to deliver, or if they impose higher quality
requirements than the Company is able to satisfy, it could lose those
relationships, which would adversely impact its revenues and results of
operations. Also, if the Company’s competitors offer its OEM
customers more favorable terms than the Company does or if its competitors are
able to take advantage of their existing relationships with OEMs, then these
OEMs may not include the Company’s software with their products. The
Company’s business will suffer if it is unable to maintain or expand its
relationships with OEMs.
The
Company depends on a limited number of customers for a significant portion of
its revenue, and the loss of one or more of these customers could materially
harm its operating results, business and financial condition.
During
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, approximately 13% and 11% of the Company’s
net revenue were received from various OEM divisions of Dell and
Hewlett-Packard, respectively, and approximately 7% and 22% of the Company’s net
revenue for fiscal year 2010 were received from the Company’s two largest
distributors, Ingram and Navarre, respectively. In addition, during
fiscal year 2010, approximately 23% of the Company’s net revenue consisted of
online web store revenue received through Digital River. The Company
anticipates that the relationships with Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Navarre, Digital
River and, to a lesser extent, Ingram, will continue to account for a
significant portion of its revenue in the future. Any adverse changes
in the Company’s relationships with any of these companies could seriously harm
its operating results, business, and financial condition if the Company was
unable to replace that relationship.
The
Company’s web-based revenue is vulnerable to third party operational problems
and other risks.
The
Company makes its products and services available through web-based retail sites
operated by third party resellers. Under these arrangements, the
Company’s reseller partners typically utilize co-branded sites, provide the
infrastructure to handle purchase transactions through their secure web sites,
and deliver the product (whether via web download or physical
fulfillment). The Company’s web store operations are subject to
numerous risks, including unanticipated operating problems, reliance on third
party computer hardware and software providers, system failures and the need to
invest in additional computer systems, diversion of sales from other channels,
rapid technological change, liability for online content, credit card fraud, and
issues relating to the use and protection of customer
information. The Company relies on the third party resellers who
operate these web stores for their smooth operation. Any interruption
of these web stores could have a negative effect on the Company’s
business. If the Company’s web store resellers were to withdraw from
this business or change their terms of service in ways that were unfavorable to
the Company, there might not be a ready alternative outsourcing organization
available to the Company, and it might be unprepared to assume operation of the
web stores. If any of these events occurs, the Company’s results of
operations would be harmed.
Changes
in the Company’s product and service offerings could cause it to defer the
recognition of revenue, which could harm its operating results and adversely
impact its ability to forecast revenue.
The
Company’s products contain advanced features and functionality that may require
it to provide increased levels of end user support, and its services require the
Company to continue to provide various benefits during the applicable service
terms. To the extent that the Company offers a greater degree of
customer support and ongoing services, it may be required to defer a greater
percentage of revenues into future periods, which could harm short term
operating results.
The
Company’s reliance on a limited number of suppliers for its manufacturing makes
it vulnerable to supplier operational problems.
The
Company outsources the manufacturing of its consumer software products to two
primary suppliers, who provide services such as parts procurement, parts
warehousing, product assembly and supply chain services. Any
disruption in the operations of these suppliers, or any product shortages or
quality assurance problems could increase the costs of manufacturing and
distributing the Company’s products and could adversely impact its operating
results. Moreover, although the Company believes there is significant
competition in the manufacture of consumer software products, if these suppliers
cease to perform or fail to perform as the Company expects, the Company could
face potentially significant delays in engaging substitute suppliers and
negotiating terms and conditions acceptable to the Company.
The
Company’s product prices may continue to decline, which could harm its operating
results.
The
market for the Company’s software is intensely competitive. It is
likely that prices for the Company’s OEM products, particularly in the DVD area,
will continue to decline due to competitive pricing pressures from other
software providers, competition in the PC and CE industries and continuing
concentration among OEM customers. In addition, the Company derives a
substantial portion of its revenue from retail sales, which also are subject to
significant competitive pricing pressures. The Company may also
experience pricing pressures in other parts of its business. These
trends could make it more difficult for the Company to increase or maintain its
revenue and could adversely affect its operating results.
Revenues
derived from the Company’s consumer DVD products have declined in recent years
and will likely continue to decline.
The
Company has experienced declines in consumer products revenue relating to the
DVD format, and absent the introduction and market acceptance of new formats
such as BD or new business and service models, including online services, such
declines could continue, adversely impacting the Company’s results of
operations.
Qualifying
and supporting the Company’s products on multiple computer platforms is time
consuming and expensive.
The
Company devotes significant time and resources to qualify and support its
software products on various PC and CE platforms, including Microsoft and Apple
operating systems. To the extent that any qualified and supported
platform is modified or upgraded, or the Company needs to qualify and support a
new platform, it could be required to expend additional engineering time and
resources, which could add significantly to its development expenses and
adversely affect its operating results.
Failure
to complete the DivX Acquisition could have a negative impact on the
Company.
On June
1, 2010 the Company entered into the Merger Agreement with DivX pursuant to
which DivX will become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The
DivX Acquisition is expected to close by September 30, 2010. Closing
of the DivX Acquisition is subject to a number of customary closing conditions,
and the closing may not occur if any of these conditions is not satisfied or
waived. Other risks associated with the DivX Acquisition
include:
|
|
·
|
the
parties may not obtain the requisite shareholder or regulatory approvals
for the DivX Acquisition;
|
|
|
·
|
the
operational and financial benefits and synergies that the Company expects
from the DivX Acquisition may not be
realized;
|
|
|
·
|
the
parties may not be able to retain key personnel;
and
|
|
|
·
|
the
impact of general economic conditions on the businesses and results of
operations of the two companies, as which conditions are further described
in these “Risk Factors.”
|
While as
of March 31, 2010, the Company has not incurred substantial expenses in
connection with the DivX Acquisition, since that date, the Company has incurred
substantial expenses and expects to incur additional significant expenses prior
to any closing.
The DivX
Merger Agreement does not contain any post-closing indemnification
provisions. Therefore, any claims for known or unknown DivX
liabilities, whether related to intellectual property ownership, infringement or
otherwise, would be the responsibility of the consolidated Company post-DivX
Acquisition. Any such claim, with or without merit, could be time
consuming to defend, result in costly litigation and divert management’s
attention.
Furthermore,
if the acquisition is not completed, the Company may be subject to a number of
adverse consequences. For example, the market price of the Company’s
common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a
market assumption that the DivX Acquisition will be completed and will be
successful.
Integrating
DivX into the Company’s existing operations will dilute the Company’s existing
shareholders’ ownership percentages, involve considerable risks and may not be
successful.
The
integration of DivX into the Company’s existing operations business may be a
complex, time-consuming and expensive process and may disrupt the Company’s
existing operations if it is not completed in a timely and efficient
manner. If the Company’s management is unable to minimize the
potential disruption to its business during the integration process, the Company
may not realize the anticipated benefits of the DivX
acquisition. Realizing the benefits of the acquisition will depend in
part on the integration of technology, operations, and personnel while
maintaining adequate focus on the Company’s core businesses. The
Company may encounter substantial difficulties, costs and delays in integrating
DivX, including the following, any of which could seriously harm its results of
operations, business, financial condition and/or the price of its
stock:
|
|
·
|
issuance
of equity securities that will dilute the Company’s current shareholders’
percentages of ownership;
|
|
|
·
|
conflicts
between business cultures;
|
|
|
·
|
difficulties
and delays in the integration of operations, personnel, technologies,
products, services, business relationships and information and other
systems of the acquired businesses;
|
|
|
·
|
the
diversion of management’s attention from normal daily operations of the
business;
|
|
|
·
|
large
one-time write-offs;
|
|
|
·
|
the
incurrence of debt and contingent
liabilities;
|
|
|
·
|
contractual
and/or intellectual property
disputes;
|
|
|
·
|
problems,
defects or other issues relating to acquired products or technologies that
become known to the Company only after the closing of DivX
Acquisition;
|
|
|
·
|
conflicts
in distribution, marketing or other important relationships, or poor
acceptance by resellers of the acquired
products;
|
|
|
·
|
difficulties
caused by entering geographic and business markets in which the Company
has no or only limited experience;
|
|
|
·
|
acquired
products and services that may not attract
customers;
|
|
|
·
|
loss
of key employees and disruptions among employees that may erode employee
morale;
|
|
|
·
|
inability
to implement uniform standards, controls, policies and
procedures;
|
|
|
·
|
failure
to achieve anticipated levels of revenue, profitability or productivity;
and
|
|
|
·
|
poor
acceptance of the Company’s revised business model and
strategies.
|
The
Company’s operating expenses may increase significantly over the near term due
to the increased headcount, expanded operations and changes related to the DivX
Acquisition. To the extent that the expenses increase but revenues do
not, there are unanticipated expenses related to the integration process, or
there are significant costs associated with presently unknown liabilities, the
combined Company’s business, operating results and financial condition may be
adversely affected. Failure to minimize the numerous risks associated
with the post-acquisition integration strategy also may adversely affect the
trading price of the Company’s common stock.
The
Company’s failure to manage its global operations effectively may adversely
affect its business and operating results.
As of
March 31, 2010, the Company had seven major locations (defined as a location
with more than 15 employees) and employed 268 employees outside the United
States. The Company faces challenges inherent in efficiently managing
employees over large geographic distances, including the need to implement
appropriate systems, controls, policies, benefits and compliance
programs. The Company’s inability to successfully manage its global
organization could have a material adverse effect on its business and results of
operations.
The
Company is subject to risks associated with its international
operations.
Revenue
derived from international customers accounted for approximately 22%, 28% and
18% of the Company’s net revenues in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The Company expects that international sales will
continue to account for a significant portion of its net revenues for the
foreseeable future. As a result, the occurrence of adverse
international political, economic or geographic events could result in
significant revenue shortfalls, which could harm the Company’s business,
financial condition and results of operations. Areas of risk
associated with the Company’s international operations include:
|
|
·
|
import
and export restrictions and duties, including tariffs, quotas, and other
barriers;
|
|
|
·
|
difficulties
in obtaining export licenses for certain
technology;
|
|
|
·
|
foreign
regulatory requirements, such as safety or radio frequency emissions
regulations;
|
|
|
·
|
liquidity
problems in various foreign
markets;
|
|
|
·
|
uncertainties
and liabilities associated with foreign tax
laws;
|
|
|
·
|
burdens
of complying with foreign laws, including consumer and data protection
laws;
|
|
|
·
|
changes
in, or impositions of, foreign legislative or regulatory
requirements;
|
|
|
·
|
difficulties
in coordinating the activities of geographically dispersed and culturally
diverse operations;
|
|
|
·
|
difficulties
in staffing, managing, and operating its international
operations;
|
|
|
·
|
potential
loss of proprietary information due to misappropriation or laws that are
less protective of the Company’s intellectual property rights than U.S.
law;
|
|
|
·
|
political
and economic instability in the countries in which the Company operates or
sells products;
|
|
|
·
|
changes
in diplomatic and trade relationships;
and
|
|
|
·
|
other
factors beyond its control including terrorism, war, natural disasters and
diseases, particularly in areas in which it has
facilities.
|
Certain
political, economic and social considerations relating to China could adversely
affect the Company.
In
addition to other risks associated with the Company’s global business, it faces
risks due to the substantial operations it conducts in China, which could be
adversely affected by political, economic and social uncertainties in China. As
of March 31, 2010, the Company had 206 employees in China, primarily carrying
out research and development activities. China has implemented
economic reforms as a way to introduce a stronger market economy, but it is
possible that these economic reforms of recent years could be slowed or
reversed. In addition, many of the laws and regulations impacting the
Company in China are relatively new, the Chinese legal system is still evolving,
the interpretation of laws and regulations is not always uniform and enforcement
of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties, all of which may limit the
remedies available in the event of any claims or disputes with third
parties.
The
Company faces increasing competition for online sales from smaller software
providers.
The
Internet enables smaller software providers to distribute products with minimal
upfront costs or resources. In the past, a substantial barrier to
entry into the packaged software market for small-scale providers was the need
to manufacture, package and distribute software through a retail or commercial
distribution chain. To the extent consumers increasingly purchase
software over the Internet, the Company expects to face increased competition
from small software development companies and programmers
worldwide. New entrants that have business models focused on Internet
distribution may have more favorable cost structures than the companies that
employ a multi-channel distribution network, which could give those competitors
cost savings, pricing and profitability advantages.
The
Company has had limited experience with online premium content services, and
cannot assure you when or if its RoxioNow Service will have a positive impact on
the Company’s profitability.
During
fiscal year 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of
CinemaNow, Inc., an online movie download and streaming business, which the
Company now operates as part of its RoxioNow Service. There is no
assurance that consumers will widely adopt the Company’s RoxioNow Service
offerings or that they will become profitable. The Company has
invested, and will continue to invest, significant time and money in building
and organizing the premium content business, and its success could be
jeopardized by difficulties in implementing and maintaining premium content
information technology systems and infrastructure and/or by increased operating
expenses and capital expenditures required to in connection with online premium
content offerings. Because the Company has limited experience with
online premium content offerings, it cannot assure you that it will be
successful or profitable.
The
Company depends on studios to license its content for its RoxioNow
Service.
The
Company’s ability to provide its RoxioNow Service depends on studios licensing
content for online delivery. The studios have great discretion
whether to license their content, and the license periods and the terms and
conditions of such licenses vary by studio. If studios change their
terms and conditions, are no longer willing or able to provide the Company
licenses, or if the Company is otherwise unable to obtain premium content on
terms that are acceptable, the ability to provide the RoxioNow Service will be
adversely affected, which could harm its business and operating
results.
The
Company relies on a number of third parties to deliver its RoxioNow
Service.
The
Company’s RoxioNow Service is embedded in various PC and CE platforms and
devices, which are then distributed through multiple retail
channels. If the Company is not successful in establishing and
maintaining appropriate OEM and distribution relationships, or if it encounters
technological, content licensing or other impediments, the Company’s ability to
grow its RoxioNow Service could be adversely impacted, which could harm its
business and operating results.
If
the Company’s customers select titles or formats that are more expensive for the
Company to acquire and deliver more frequently, the Company’s expenses may
increase.
Certain
titles cost the Company more to acquire or result in greater revenue-sharing
expenses. If customers select these titles more often on a
proportional basis compared to all titles selected, the Company’s costs and
margins could be adversely affected. In addition, films released in
high-definition formats may be more expensive for the Company to acquire and
deliver, and if customers select these formats more frequently on a proportional
basis, the Company’s costs and margins could be adversely affected.
The
Company could be liable for substantial damages if there is unauthorized
duplication of the content it sells.
The
Company believes that it is able to license premium content through its RoxioNow
Service in part because the service has been designed to reduce the risk of
unauthorized duplication and playback of this content. If these
security measures fail, studios and other content providers may terminate their
agreements with the Company and, in addition, the Company could be liable for
substantial damages. Security breaches might also discourage other
content providers from entering into agreements with the Company. The
Company may be required to expend substantial money and other resources to
protect against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems caused
by security breaches.
The
Company’s executive
officers and other key personnel are critical to its business, and because there
is significant competition for personnel in the Company’s industry, it may not
be able to attract and retain qualified personnel.
The
Company’s success depends on the continued contributions of its executive
management team and its technical, marketing, sales, customer support and
product development personnel. The loss of key individuals or
significant numbers of such personnel could significantly harm the Company’s
business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company
does not have any life insurance or other insurance covering the loss of any of
its key employees.
Some
of the Company’s competitors possess greater technological and financial
resources, may produce better or more cost-effective products or services and
may be more effective than the Company, in marketing and promoting their
products and services.
There is
a substantial risk that competing companies will produce better or more
cost-effective products or services or will be better equipped than the Company
is to promote products or services in the marketplace. A number of
companies offer products and services that compete with the Company’s products,
either directly or indirectly. Many of these companies have greater
financial and technological resources than the Company does.
Errors
in Company products and services may result in loss of or delay in market
acceptance, which could adversely impact the Company’s reputation and
business.
The
Company’s products and services may contain undetected errors, especially when
first introduced or as new versions are released, and the Company may need to
make significant modifications to correct these errors. Failure to
achieve acceptance could result in a delay in, or inability to, receive payment,
a rejection of products and services, damage to the Company’s reputation, as
well as lost revenues, diverted development resources, increased service and
warranty costs and related litigation expenses and potential liability to third
parties, any of which could harm the Company’s business.
The
Company is vulnerable to earthquakes, labor issues and other unexpected
events.
The
Company’s corporate headquarters, as well as the majority of its research and
development activities, are located in California and China, both of which are
areas known for seismic activity. An earthquake or other disaster
could result in an interruption in the Company business. The
Company’s business also may be impacted by labor issues related to its
operations and/or those of its suppliers, distributors or
customers. Such an interruption could harm its operating
results. The Company is not likely to have sufficient insurance to
compensate adequately for lost revenues and losses that it may sustain as a
result of any natural disasters or other unexpected events.
If
the Company fails to protect its intellectual property rights it may not be able
to market its products and services successfully.
Unlicensed
copying and use of the Company’s intellectual property or illegal infringements
of its intellectual property rights represent losses of revenue to the
Company. The Company’s products and services are based in large part
on proprietary technology, which it has sought to protect with patents,
trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. Effective intellectual
property protection may not be available in every country in which the Company’s
products and services may be manufactured, marketed, distributed, sold or
used. Moreover, despite the Company’s efforts, these measures only
provide limited protection. Third parties may try to copy or reverse
engineer portions of the Company’s products or services or otherwise obtain and
use its intellectual property without authorization. The Company
cannot assure you that the protection of its proprietary rights will be adequate
or that its competitors will not develop independently similar technology,
duplicate the Company’s products or services or design around any of its patents
or other intellectual property rights.
The
Company may become involved in costly and time-consuming patent
litigation.
Third
parties could claim that the Company’s products or services infringe their
patents, trademarks or other intellectual property rights. As new
standards and technologies evolve, the Company believes that it may face an
increasing number of third party claims relating to alleged patent
infringements. Intellectual property litigation is time consuming and
costly, diverts management resources and could result in the invalidation or
impairment of the Company’s intellectual property rights. If
litigation results in an unfavorable outcome, the Company could be subject to
substantial damage claims and/or be required to cease production of infringing
products, terminate its use of the infringing technology, develop non-infringing
technology and/or obtain a license agreement to continue using the technology at
issue. Such license agreements might not be available to the Company
on acceptable terms, resulting in serious harm to its business.
The
Company may be liable to some of its customers for damages that they incur in
connection with intellectual property claims.
Although
the Company attempts to limit its exposure to liability arising from
infringement of third-party intellectual property rights in the Company’s
license agreements with customers, it does not always succeed in obtaining the
limitations it seeks. If the Company is required to pay damages to or
incur liability on behalf of its customers, its business could be
harmed. Moreover, even if a particular claim falls outside of the
Company indemnity or warranty obligations, its customers may be entitled to
additional contractual remedies against the Company, which could harm its
business. Furthermore, even if the Company is not liable to its
customers, its customers may stop buying its products or attempt to pass on to
the Company the cost of any license fees or damages owed to third parties by
reducing the amounts they pay for the Company’s products. Any of
these results could harm the Company’s business.
The
Company may incur losses associated with currency fluctuations and may not
effectively reduce its exposure.
The
Company’s operating results are subject to volatility resulting from
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, including:
|
|
·
|
currency
movements in which the U.S. dollar becomes stronger with respect to
foreign currencies, thereby reducing relative demand for its products and
services outside the United States;
and
|
|
|
·
|
currency
movements in which a foreign currency in which the Company has incurred
expenses becomes stronger in relation to the U.S. dollar, thereby raising
the Company’s expenses for the same level of operating
activity.
|
The
Company’s stock price has been volatile, is likely to continue to be volatile,
and could decline substantially.
The price
of the Company’s common stock is likely to continue to be highly
volatile. The price of its common stock could fluctuate significantly
for any of the following reasons, among others:
|
|
·
|
fluctuations
in the U.S. or world economy or general market conditions, as well as
those specific to specific to the PC, CE and related
industries;
|
|
|
·
|
future
announcements concerning the Company or its
competitors;
|
|
|
·
|
earnings
announcements, quarterly variations in operating results, including
variations due to one-time payments and other non-recurring revenues or
costs that may result from certain customer relationships, as well as
variations due to the timing of revenue recognition, including deferrals
of revenue;
|
|
|
·
|
charges,
amortization and other financial effects relating to any future
acquisitions or divestitures;
|
|
|
·
|
introduction
of new products or services or changes in product or service pricing
policies by the Company or its competitors, or the entry of new
competitors into the markets for digital media software or the digital
distribution of premium content;
|
|
|
·
|
acquisition
or loss of significant customers, distributors or
suppliers;
|
|
|
·
|
changes
in earnings estimates by the Company or by independent analysts who cover
it;
|
|
|
·
|
delay
in delivery to market or acceptance of new products and
services;
|
|
|
·
|
disclosure
of material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting or its disclosure controls and procedures or of other corporate
governance issues; and/or
|
|
|
·
|
costs
of litigation and intellectual property
claims.
|
In
addition, stock markets in general, and those for technology stocks in
particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations in recent
years, which frequently have been unrelated to the operating performance of the
affected companies. These broad market fluctuations may impact
adversely the market price of the Company’s common stock.
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item
2. Properties
The
Company’s corporate headquarters is located in Novato, California, where it
occupies approximately 12,465 square feet under a lease expiring in February 28,
2013. During fiscal 2010, the Company decreased its leased corporate
headquarters property by 59% or 18,104 square feet from 30,569 leased in fiscal
2009. The Company and its foreign subsidiaries lease additional space
in various locations in the United States and abroad for local sales and product
development. The Company believes that the existing facilities are in
good condition and adequate to meet its requirements for the foreseeable
future. For additional information related to leases, see Part II,
Item 8, Note 3, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Annual Report.
Item
3. Legal Proceedings
Litigation
Matters
On
October 4, 2007, a putative shareholder class action was filed in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California against the
Company and various of its executive officers and directors, premised on
allegations concerning the granting of stock options by the Company and the
alleged filing of false and misleading financial statements. On March
21, 2008, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on behalf of a
proposed class of plaintiffs comprised of persons that purchased the Company’s
shares between October 23, 2002 and May 17, 2007. On May 27, 2008,
plaintiffs filed a “corrected” consolidated amended complaint which alleges
various violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules
thereunder. In July 2009, the parties reached an agreement in
principle to settle this action, and on October 15, 2009, the parties executed a
stipulation of settlement providing for the creation of a settlement fund of $5
million to satisfy claims submitted by class members and to pay any attorneys
fees awarded by the Court. As part of the settlement, the Company’s
Directors and Officers (“D&O”) liability insurers agreed to fund the
settlement amount. On April 8, 2010, this settlement was formally
approved and a final judgment and order of dismissal with prejudice was
entered. The Company’s D&O liability insurance has covered the
legal fees and costs associated with the above legal action, including payment
of legal fees of $0.7 million during fiscal 2010.
Indemnification
Obligations
In the
normal course of business, the Company provides indemnifications of varying
scopes, including limited product warranties and indemnification of customers
against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties
arising from the use of its products or services. The Company accrues
for known indemnification issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably
estimated. Historically, costs related to these indemnifications have
not been significant, but because potential future costs are highly variable,
the Company is unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these
indemnifications on its future results of operations. As permitted
under California law and in accordance with its Bylaws and certain other
commitments and agreements, the Company indemnifies its officers, directors and
members of its senior management against certain claims and liabilities, subject
to certain limits, while they serve at its request in such
capacity. The maximum amount of potential indemnification is unknown
and potentially unlimited; however, the Company has D&O liability insurance
that enables it to recover a portion of future indemnification claims paid,
subject to retentions, conditions and limitations of those
policies.
Item
4. (Removed and Reserved)
PART
II
Item
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
The
Company’s common stock is currently traded on The Nasdaq Global Select Market
under the SNIC ticker
symbol. The low price and high prices of its common stock during
fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 are as follows:
|
Fiscal Year 2010
|
|
Low Price
|
|
|
High Price
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
Low Price
|
|
|
High Price
|
|
|
Quarter
ended 6/30/2009
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.88 |
|
Quarter
ended 6/30/2008
|
|
$ |
5.61 |
|
|
$ |
10.33 |
|
|
Quarter
ended 9/30/2009
|
|
$ |
2.57 |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
Quarter
ended 9/30/2008
|
|
$ |
3.31 |
|
|
$ |
6.84 |
|
|
Quarter
ended 12/31/2009
|
|
$ |
4.65 |
|
|
$ |
12.90 |
|
Quarter
ended 12/31/2008
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
4.67 |
|
|
Quarter
ended 3/31/2010
|
|
$ |
7.50 |
|
|
$ |
12.23 |
|
Quarter
ended 3/31/2009
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
As of
March 31, 2010, the last reported sale price on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
for the Company’s common shares was $9.37 per share.
Record
Holders
As of
March 31, 2010, there were approximately 107 registered holders of the Company’s
common stock. The Company believes, however, that many beneficial
holders of its common stock have registered their shares in nominee or street
name, and that there are substantially more than 107 beneficial
owners.
Dividend
Policy
The
Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock and
does not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. It is presently
the policy of the board of directors to retain earnings for use in expanding and
developing the Company’s business. Accordingly, the Company does not
anticipate paying any cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable
future.
Equity
Compensation Plans
Information
relating to the securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans is set forth below (in thousands except per share data):
|
Plan Category
|
|
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options and RSUs
(#)
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
($)
|
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plans
(#)
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by
shareholders
|
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
$ |
4.96 |
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
Equity Compensation Plan not approved by shareholders (1)(2)
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
$ |
6.84 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
Foreign Compensation Plan not approved by shareholders (1)(2)
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
$ |
15.93 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,793 |
|
|
$ |
5.31 |
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
(1)
|
For
information and description of the Company’s stock plans, see Part II,
Item 8, Note 4, “Shareholders’ Equity,” to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Annual
Report.
|
|
|
(2)
|
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company discontinued the 2004
Equity Compensation Plan and the 2005 Foreign Compensation Plan
(non-shareholder approved plans). No additional grants will be
made under these discontinued Plans and the termination of these plans
will not affect any awards outstanding on the date of
termination. For additional information, see Part II, Item 8,
Note 4, “Shareholders' Equity - Discontinued Plans,” to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this Annual
Report.
|
Stock
Performance Graph
The
following Stock Performance Graph compares the cumulative total shareholder
return on the Company’s common stock with the cumulative total return of the
Standard and Poor’s 500 Index and the Standard and Poor’s Information Technology
Index. The total shareholder return reflects the change in share
price during the period, assuming an investment of $100 on March 31, 2005 plus
the reinvestment of dividends, if any. No dividends were paid on the
Company’s common stock during the period shown. The stock price
performance shown below is not necessarily indicative of future stock
performance.
|
Measurement
Period
(Fiscal
Year Covered)
|
|
Sonic
Solutions
|
|
|
S&P
500
Index
|
|
|
S&P
Information
Technology
|
|
|
FYE
03/05
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
FYE
03/06
|
|
$ |
120.33 |
|
|
$ |
111.73 |
|
|
$ |
113.53 |
|
|
FYE
03/07
|
|
$ |
93.69 |
|
|
$ |
124.95 |
|
|
$ |
117.05 |
|
|
FYE
03/08
|
|
$ |
64.12 |
|
|
$ |
118.60 |
|
|
$ |
116.55 |
|
|
FYE
03/09
|
|
$ |
7.97 |
|
|
$ |
73.43 |
|
|
$ |
81.51 |
|
|
FYE
03/10
|
|
$ |
62.26 |
|
|
$ |
109.97 |
|
|
$ |
128.79 |
|
Item
6. Selected Financial Data
The
following data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated
Financial Statements, the notes thereto, and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included
elsewhere in this Annual Report. The consolidated statements of
operations data for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, and the selected
consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, are derived from,
and are qualified by reference to, the audited consolidated financial statements
that are included in this Annual Report. The consolidated statements of
operations data for fiscal years 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated balance
sheet data as of March 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are derived from audited
consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Annual
Report.
|
|
|
Years
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except share and share data)
|
|
|
Net
revenue
(1)
|
|
$ |
104,345 |
|
|
$ |
119,958 |
|
|
$ |
132,874 |
|
|
$ |
148,649 |
|
|
$ |
147,608 |
|
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
31,856 |
|
|
|
32,901 |
|
|
|
33,151 |
|
|
|
34,389 |
|
|
|
34,132 |
|
|
Impairment
of intangibles (2)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,579 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
72,489 |
|
|
|
67,478 |
|
|
|
99,723 |
|
|
|
114,260 |
|
|
|
113,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
and sales
(1)(3)
|
|
|
29,975 |
|
|
|
35,810 |
|
|
|
36,186 |
|
|
|
33,304 |
|
|
|
35,606 |
|
|
Research
and development
(3)
|
|
|
24,696 |
|
|
|
39,250 |
|
|
|
44,511 |
|
|
|
44,513 |
|
|
|
44,157 |
|
|
General
and administrative (3)
|
|
|
17,669 |
|
|
|
24,160 |
|
|
|
27,310 |
|
|
|
20,487 |
|
|
|
22,214 |
|
|
Acquired
in-process technology
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Abandoned
acquisition
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Business
integration
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
Restructuring
(4)
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
3,947 |
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Impairment
of goodwill
(2)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
56,174 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
72,853 |
|
|
|
159,341 |
|
|
|
111,159 |
|
|
|
102,720 |
|
|
|
102,313 |
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
(91,863 |
) |
|
|
(11,436 |
) |
|
|
11,540 |
|
|
|
11,163 |
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
2,845 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(767 |
) |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
(2,024 |
) |
|
|
(1,846 |
) |
|
Other
income (expense), net
|
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
(92,963 |
) |
|
|
(9,791 |
) |
|
|
12,321 |
|
|
|
10,157 |
|
|
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
25,160 |
|
|
|
(4,254 |
) |
|
|
6,071 |
|
|
|
(9,177 |
) |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,213 |
) |
|
$ |
(118,123 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,537 |
) |
|
$ |
6,250 |
|
|
$ |
19,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis
and diluted net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) per share - basic
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.46 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
Net
income (loss) per share - diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.46 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
Shares
used in per share calculation - basic
|
|
|
27,792 |
|
|
|
26,535 |
|
|
|
26,247 |
|
|
|
25,982 |
|
|
|
24,750 |
|
|
Shares
used in per share calculation - diluted
|
|
|
27,792 |
|
|
|
26,535 |
|
|
|
26,247 |
|
|
|
27,431 |
|
|
|
26,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data (at period end)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$ |
39,439 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
36,828 |
|
|
$ |
35,789 |
|
|
$ |
41,923 |
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
95,410 |
|
|
$ |
66,737 |
|
|
$ |
210,049 |
|
|
$ |
217,029 |
|
|
$ |
214,336 |
|
|
Total liabilities
(5)
|
|
$ |
32,807 |
|
|
$ |
40,093 |
|
|
$ |
65,447 |
|
|
$ |
66,196 |
|
|
$ |
76,854 |
|
|
Shareholders'
equity
|
|
$ |
62,603 |
|
|
$ |
26,644 |
|
|
$ |
144,602 |
|
|
$ |
150,833 |
|
|
$ |
137,482 |
|
|
|
(1)
|
Warrant
share-based expense of $0.7 million and $1.1 million for fiscal 2010 is
included in contra-revenue and marketing and sales operating expense,
respectively.
|
|
|
(2)
|
See
Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report for
additional details regarding impairment of intangibles and
goodwill.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
share-based compensation expense as
follows:
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Marketing
and sales
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
|
$ |
3,846 |
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
Total
share-based compensation expense
|
|
$ |
2,557 |
|
|
$ |
2,191 |
|
|
$ |
1,545 |
|
|
$ |
2,766 |
|
|
$ |
10,234 |
|
|
|
(4)
|
See
Note 8, “Restructuring” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in this Annual Report for additional details regarding the Company’s
restructuring plans.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Prior
fiscal years 2009 and 2006 amounts include prior disclosed non-current
portion of long term capital lease amounts of $0.2 million and $30.0
million.
|
Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
The
following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and
results of operations should be read in conjunction with its Consolidated
Financial Statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual
Report. In addition to historical consolidated financial information,
the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions as described under the
“Forward-Looking Statements” section that appears earlier in this Annual
Report. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated by these forward-looking statements as a result of many
factors, including those discussed under Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and
elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
of Business
The
Company is a leading developer of products and services that enable the
creation, management, and enjoyment of digital media content across a wide
variety of technology platforms. The Company’s products and services
offer innovative technologies to consumers, OEMs, businesses, high-end
professional DVD authoring experts and developers. The Company
distributes its products and services through retailers and distributors, PC and
CE OEMs, Internet websites including www.roxio.com, and other
channels. The Company also licenses core technology and intellectual
property to other software companies and technology manufacturers for
integration into their own products and services. Sonic software is
intended for use with Microsoft Windows and Apple Mac operating systems, as well
as some Linux environments and proprietary platforms.
Sonic
products and services are used to accomplish a wide variety of tasks, including
creating and distributing digital audio and video content in a variety of
formats; renting, purchasing and enjoying Hollywood movies and other premium
content; producing digital media photo and video shows for sharing online and
via television, PCs and CE devices; recording and playback of digital content on
DVD, BD, other storage media and portable devices; managing digital media on PCs
and CE devices; and backing up and preserving digital information, both to local
storage devices and on the Internet.
The
Company differentiates between digital media content that is created by
consumers (sometimes referred to herein as “personal” content) and digital
content that is professionally created for mass consumption (sometimes referred
to herein as “premium” content). Accordingly, the Company organizes
its business into two reportable operating segments targeted at these different
forms of content: the “Roxio Consumer Products” segment, which offers
products and services related to personal content, and the “Premium Content”
segment, which offers products and services related to premium
content. These segments reflect the Company’s internal organizational
structure, as well as the processes by which management makes operating
decisions, allocates resources and assesses performance.
Roxio
Consumer Products Segment
The Roxio
Consumer Products segment creates software and services that enable consumers to
easily create, manage, and share personal digital media content on and across a
broad range of connected devices. A wide array of leading technology
companies and developers rely on Roxio products, services and technologies to
bring innovative digital media functionality to PCs and next-generation CE
devices and platforms. The Roxio Consumer Products segment offers
products and services under a variety of names, including BackonTrack, Backup
MyPC, CinePlayer, Crunch, Easy LP to MP3, Easy VHS to DVD, Just!Burn, MyDVD,
MyTV To Go, PhotoShow, PhotoSuite, Popcorn, RecordNow, Roxio Burn, Roxio Copy
& Convert, Roxio Creator, Toast, VideoWave, WinOnCD, and
others. These products are sold in a number of different versions and
languages. The Company distributes these products through various
channels, including “bundling” arrangements with OEMs, volume licensing
programs, its web store, and third party web-based and “bricks and mortar”
retail stores. The Company also markets the core technology that
powers Roxio products to other companies who wish to build their own PC software
products.
Premium
Content Segment
The
Premium Content segment offers a range of products and services related to the
creation, distribution and enjoyment of premium content. As part of
this segment, the Company also sells, rents and distributes premium
entertainment content to consumers over the Internet under RoxioNow branding (in
this Annual Report, this service may be referred to as the “RoxioNow
Service”). Also within this segment, the Professional Products Group
offers software under the Scenarist, CineVision, and DVDit product names as well
as under the Sonic and Roxio Professional brands to major motion picture
studios, high-end authoring houses and other professional
customers. The Company also develops software components that it
licenses to CE companies to enable their devices to offer premium content to
consumers, and licenses intellectual property, including patents.
Recent
Trends & Events
Due to
the proliferation of computer technology, broadband Internet connectivity and
personal electronic devices of all kinds, digital media content is now
everywhere. The Company’s products and services enable people to
create, manage, enjoy and distribute premium and personal digital content,
allowing them to organize and share their digital lives and memories in new and
innovative ways. The Company’s strategy is to utilize its technology,
expertise and competitive positioning to deliver exciting products and services
to enhance the value of digital media in people’s lives. The Company
faces evolving trends in the technology industry that can provide opportunities
as well as potential risks, including:
|
|
·
|
Optical Disc Playback
Evolution – Optical disc technologies have enjoyed tremendous
growth and extremely widespread consumer adoption, but they tend to
evolve, mature and change rapidly. For example, multiple DVD
playback units (including set-top players, game consoles and PCs) are
present in most households, but DVD sales are now falling as consumers
have begun to embrace online alternatives, as well as new formats such as
BD. Sales of BD units and players have been growing at a rate
comparable to that of standard definition DVD during the equivalent time
periods in its life cycle, implying that BD is positioned to grow
dramatically over the next several years, but the growth of the BD format
has not yet fully compensated for the recent drop in DVD
sales. Other technological trends and events can also impact
the demand for the Company’s digital media products and
services. For example, as new operating systems are introduced
(for example, Windows 7 in October 2009), consumers are offered new tools
for editing, formatting and burning digital media, and there are
opportunities for software vendors such as the Company to provide products
that are complementary to the new operating
systems.
|
|
|
·
|
Growth of Digital Distribution
of Premium Content – Content owners, such as Hollywood studios, are
increasingly offering sell-through and rental of premium content through
digital distribution. Simultaneously, a growing number of
consumers are enjoying and taking advantage of the benefits of digital
distribution of premium content. As more Internet-enabled
electronic devices offer delivery of premium content, the rate of adoption
and number of title offerings should continue to
increase.
|
|
|
·
|
Digital Phone, Portable and
Gaming Devices – Consumer usage of mobile phones, gaming consoles
and portable CE devices, particularly those with high-end digital media
capabilities, continues to increase worldwide. The growing
popularity of portable devices leads to greater demand for software
products and services, such as those offered by the Company, that provide
digital media management and
functionality.
|
|
|
·
|
Growth of Online Social
Networks – Online social networks, such as Facebook and MySpace,
increasingly feature personal digital photo, video and audio content, and
these networks function as distribution platforms for sharing and enjoying
digital media content. The rising popularity of these networks
and their platforms creates an increased demand for products and services
that can capture, create, edit and manage digital
media.
|
During
fiscal 2009, the Company acquired the assets of Simple Star, Inc., a software
and online service provider, and the assets of CinemaNow, Inc., an online
entertainment provider. The Company has utilized the Simple Star
assets to further its initiative to embrace web services as an important part of
its consumer business, while the addition of the CinemaNow assets has assisted
the Company in expanding its premium content product and service offerings and
implementing the RoxioNow Service.
During
fiscal 2009, the Company initiated restructuring plans to reorganize operations,
optimize its engineering and development efforts, reduce workforce, consolidate
divisions into a single reporting segment, unifying its OEM licensing efforts,
and eliminate organizational redundancies. For more information see Note 8,
“Restructuring,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
Annual Report.
Strategic
Objectives
Enable Consumers to Buy and Play
Premium Content Anywhere and at Anytime. The Company believes
that digital distribution of premium content will grow dramatically over the
next few years, and that ultimately industry revenue from the digital
distribution of premium content may surpass revenue from the sale and rental of
premium content on optical media such as DVD and BD. The Company has
put substantial effort into its RoxioNow Service initiatives, as it believes
that this area may offer a strong opportunity for counterbalancing the recent
decline in DVD sales and the adverse impact of that trend on the Company’s
operating results. As the digital content ecosystem continues to
expand and evolve, the Company aims to make its products and services available
through an increasing range of platforms, devices and partners, with the goal
that the Company’s technology will represent a symbol of compatibility and a
common point of interaction for consumers who want to enjoy Hollywood movies and
other premium digital content anywhere and anytime.
Develop and strengthen Roxio-branded
products and services. The Company seeks to build on the brand
strength of its Roxio products and services by strengthening its relationships
with OEMs and retail partners, while deepening its relationship with consumers
by adding new products and services. The Company continues to utilize
its knowledge and expertise to develop and introduce products and services
relating to new formats such as BD, and believes that these efforts will assist
it in offsetting price pressure and declining sales associated with the DVD
format. Additionally, the Company plans to continue to enhance its
Web-based offerings, add innovative solutions to its consumer product portfolio
and extend the reach of the Roxio brand to a new audience of online
users.
Outlook
While the
continuing global economic downturn and the maturation of the DVD format have
adversely impacted the Company’s business and financial results during recent
periods, the Company believes that the digital distribution of premium content
is poised to enjoy commercial success, and that its RoxioNow Service initiatives
provide it with a strategic opportunity to grow its business rapidly in this
area. The Company further believes that it is well positioned to
capitalize on its strong brand name, consumer market position, and OEM
relationships as digital media formats such as BD continue to
evolve. The Company made significant strategic and financial progress
during fiscal 2010 to bring costs in line with revenues while positioning the
Company for revenue growth and margin improvement.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
Company prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In preparing its
Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company makes estimates, judgments, and
assumptions that can significantly affect the amounts reported in its
consolidated financial statements. The Company bases its estimates on
historical experience and various other assumptions that it believes to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these
estimates. The Company regularly evaluates its estimates, judgments,
and assumptions and makes changes accordingly. The Company believes
the following accounting policies and estimates are the most critical and
significant to understanding and evaluating its financial condition and results
of operations.
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) approved the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) as the single source of authoritative
nongovernmental GAAP. ASC does not change current GAAP, but
simplifies user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the
authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one
place. All existing accounting standards documents was superseded and
all other accounting literature not included in the ASC is considered
non-authoritative. The Company adopted the ASC in June 2009 and
discloses the ASC prescribed topic numbering references on a primary
basis.
Use
of estimates
On an
ongoing basis, the Company evaluates estimates used. The following
accounting policies require management to make estimates, judgments and
assumptions and are critical in fully understanding and evaluating the Company’s
reported financial results:
|
|
·
|
Allowances
for sales returns and doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
·
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
·
|
Valuation
of acquired businesses, assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
·
|
Goodwill,
intangible assets and other long-lived
assets
|
|
|
·
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
·
|
Income
tax and deferred tax asset
valuation
|
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company derives its revenue primarily from licenses of its software products,
software development agreements and maintenance and support. The
Company also sells and licenses patents and patented technology. The
Company recognizes revenue when the following criteria have been
met:
|
|
·
|
Persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists;
|
|
|
·
|
Delivery
has occurred or services have been
rendered;
|
|
|
·
|
The
arrangement fees are fixed or determinable;
and
|
|
|
·
|
Collection
is considered probable.
|
If the
Company determines that any of the above criteria has not been met, the Company
will defer recognition of the revenue until all the criteria have been
met.
The
Company generally considers arrangements with payment terms longer than six
months from the time of delivery not to be fixed or determinable, and recognizes
the related revenue as payments become due from the customer, provided all other
revenue recognition criteria have been met. If the Company determines
that collection of a fee is not probable, it will defer the fees and recognize
revenue upon cash receipt, provided all other revenue recognition criteria have
been met.
Generally,
the Company records revenue at gross and records costs related to a sale in cost
of revenue. In those cases where the Company is not the primary
obligor or merchant of record and/or does not bear credit risk, or where it
earns a fixed transactional fee, the Company records revenue under the net
method. When the Company records revenues at net, revenue is reported
at the net amount received and retained by the Company.
Multiple Element Arrangements -
In arrangements that include multiple elements (e.g., software, specified
upgrades, support services, installation services, and/or training), the Company
allocates the total revenue to be earned under the arrangement to the elements
based on their relative fair value, as determined by vendor-specific objective
evidence of fair value (“VSOE”). VSOE is generally the price charged
when that element is sold separately or, in the case of support services, annual
renewal rates.
In
arrangements where VSOE exists only for the undelivered elements, the Company
uses the “residual method” under which it defers the full fair value of the
undelivered elements and recognizes the difference between the total arrangement
fee and the amount deferred for undelivered items as revenue. If VSOE
does not exist for all elements but the only undelivered element is maintenance
and support, the Company recognizes revenue from the arrangement ratably over
the maintenance and support period. If VSOE does not exist for
undelivered elements that are specified products or upgrades, the Company defers
revenue until the earlier of the delivery of all elements or the point at which
it determines VSOE for these undelivered elements.
Product Sales - Except in the
case of consignment arrangements, the Company recognizes revenue from the sale
of its packaged software products when title transfers to the distributor or
retailer. When the Company sells packaged software products to
distributors and retailers on a consignment basis, it recognizes revenue upon
sell through to an end customer.
The
Company’s distributor arrangements often provide distributors with certain
product rotation rights. The Company estimates returns based on its
historical return experience and other factors such as channel inventory levels
and the introduction of new products. These allowances are recorded
as a reduction of revenues and as an offset to accounts receivable to the extent
the Company has legal right of offset, otherwise they are recorded in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities. If future returns patterns
differ from past returns patterns, for example due to reduced demand for the
Company’s product, it may be required to increase these allowances in the future
and may be required to reduce future revenues.
The
Company accounts for cash consideration (such as sales incentives) that it gives
to its customers or resellers as a reduction of revenue rather than as an
operating expense unless the Company receives a benefit that is separate from
the customer’s purchase from the Company and for which it can reasonably
estimate the fair value.
Software License Arrangements -
Provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, the
Company recognizes revenue from software licensing arrangements upon delivery,
or, in the case of per-unit royalty arrangements, upon sell through to an end
user as evidenced by the receipt of a customer royalty report.
Software Development Arrangements -
For arrangements that include development or other services that are
essential to the functionality of the licensed software, the Company recognizes
revenue using the percentage-of-completion method. Under the
percentage-of-completion method, management estimates the number of hours needed
to complete a particular project, and revenues are recognized as the contract
progresses to completion. Changes in estimates are recognized in the
period in which they are known.
In
certain instances, a development agreement may include additional undelivered
elements, such as maintenance and support, or a specified upgrade or other
deliverable, and VSOE of fair value may not exist for the undelivered elements,
or the Company may not have sufficient experience with either the type of
project or the customer involved to be able to make reliable estimates towards
completion. If the Company cannot reliably estimate total
profitability under the agreement but is reasonably assured that no loss will be
realized on the agreement, the Company recognizes revenue using the zero gross
margin method. Under the zero gross margin method, revenue recognized
under the contract equals costs incurred under the contract and any profit is
deferred until development is complete. The Company recognizes the
deferred gross profit over the remaining contractual service period (for
example, the initial maintenance period).
In
addition, the Company receives prepayments of certain usage-based services and
offers certain products and services on a subscription
basis. Subscription revenue is recognized ratably over the related
subscription period. Prepaid revenue is deferred and recognized over
the usage period.
Content and Services – Premium content revenue
includes RoxioNow Service content sales. When purchased on an
individual transaction basis, the Company recognizes revenue from the sale of
individual content titles in the period when the content is purchased and
delivered. The Company generally recognizes revenue from the sale of
content subscriptions pro rata over the term of the subscription
period.
Allowance
for Sales Returns and Doubtful Accounts
The
Company’s distributors and retail arrangements provide for certain product
rotation rights and permit certain product returns. The Company
estimates reserves for these rights of return based on historical return rates,
timing of new product releases, and channel inventory levels.
The
Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for potentially
uncollectible accounts based on past collection history and specific risks
identified in its portfolio of receivables. If the financial
condition of the Company’s distributors or other customers deteriorates,
resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, or if payments
from distributors or other customers are significantly delayed, additional
allowances may be required.
Goodwill,
Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets
Intangible
assets are classified into three categories: (1) intangible assets
with definite lives subject to amortization; (2) intangible assets with
indefinite lives not subject to amortization; and
(3) goodwill. For goodwill and intangible assets with definite
lives, tests for impairment must be performed if conditions exist that indicate
the carrying value may not be recoverable. For intangible assets with
indefinite lives and goodwill, tests for impairment must be performed at least
annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that assets
might be impaired.
The
Company tests for impairment at least annually, in the Company’s fourth fiscal
quarter, or more frequently if events and circumstances warrant.
The
Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets for impairment
by comparing the fair value of each of its reporting units to its carrying value
including the goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. A reporting
unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating
segment. To determine the reporting unit’s fair value, the Company
uses the income approach under which it evaluates estimated discounted future
cash flows of that unit. The Company bases its cash flow assumptions
on historical and forecasted revenue and operating costs.
The
Company has reviewed the criteria necessary to evaluate the number of reporting
units that exist. Based on its review, the Company has determined it
operates in two reporting segments, Roxio Consumer and Premium
Content.
A
detailed determination of the fair value of a reporting unit may be carried
forward from one year to the next if all of the following criteria have been
met:
|
|
a.
|
The
assets and liabilities that make up the reporting unit have not changed
significantly since the most recent fair value
determination.
|
|
|
b.
|
The
most recent fair value determination resulted in an amount that exceeded
the carrying amount of the reporting unit by a substantial
margin.
|
|
|
c.
|
Based
on an analysis of events that have occurred and circumstances that have
changed since the most recent fair value determination, the likelihood
that a current fair value determination would be less than the current
carrying amount of the reporting unit is
remote.
|
Long-lived
assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually or whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. The Company evaluates long-lived assets, including
intangible assets with finite useful lives, for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. The determination of recoverability of long-lived assets
and intangible assets with finite lives is based on an estimate of the
undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of that asset and its
eventual disposition.
Based on
a combination of factors occurring during fiscal 2009, including the economic
environment, market conditions and decline of the Company’s stock value, the
Company determined that indicators for impairment of goodwill and intangible
assets existed. Accordingly, during the third quarter of fiscal 2009,
the Company performed an impairment analysis and recorded impairment charges of
$19.6 million and $56.2 million for its intangible assets and goodwill,
respectively, related to its Roxio Consumer reporting segment.
Share-Based
Compensation
The
Company measures compensation cost for share-based awards at fair
value. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date
based on the fair value of the award and will be recognized over the requisite
service period, which is generally the vesting period. The Company
uses the Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black Scholes”) option pricing model to
determine the fair value of stock option shares. The determination of
the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an
option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as
assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective
variables. These variables include the Company’s expected stock price
volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock
option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected
dividends. The fair value of RSUs is equivalent to the market price
of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.
Income
Tax and Deferred Tax Asset Valuation
The
provision for income taxes is calculated using the liability method of
accounting. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized based on the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets
and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using the tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. In assessing net deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. When the Company does not
believe realization of a deferred tax asset is likely, it records a valuation
allowance. The valuation allowance is evaluated at the end of each
year, considering positive and negative evidence about whether the deferred tax
assets will be realized.
The
Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and certain foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the
Company’s uncertain tax positions and determining its provision for income
taxes. Accounting for income tax uncertainties requires a two-step
approach to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. The first
step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the
position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or
litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax
benefit as the largest amount that is more than fifty percent likely of being
realized upon settlement.
The
Company adjusts these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances,
such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an
estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters
is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the
provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is
made. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve
provisions as well as related interest and penalties.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
The
following represents a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements that could
impact or have impacted the Company’s accounting, reporting, and/or disclosure
of financial information.
In
September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued its final
consensus for Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13 (formerly “EITF
08-1”), Revenue Arrangements
with Multiple Deliverables, which will supersede the guidance in ASC
605-25 (previous authoritative guidance: EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables). ASU 2009-13 retains the criteria from ASC 605-5
for when delivered items in a multiple-deliverable arrangement should be
considered separate units of accounting, but removes the previous separation
criterion under ASC 605-25 that objective and reliable evidence of fair value of
any undelivered items must exist for the delivered items to be considered a
separate unit or separate units of accounting. ASU 2009-13 introduces
a selling price hierarchy for multiple deliverable arrangements and allows for
management selling price estimates in cases where no vendor specific objective
evidence or third party evidence is available. Additionally, this
guidance eliminates the residual method of allocation. ASU 2009-13 is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The
Company is currently evaluating ASU 2009-13 and the impact, if any, that it may
have on its results of operations or financial position.
In
September 2009, the EITF issued its final consensus for ASU 2009-14 (formerly
“EITF 09-3”), Applicability of
SOP 97-2 to Certain Arrangements that Include Software Elements, which
amends the prior guidance to exclude tangible products that contain software and
non-software components that function together to deliver the products’
“essential functionality” from the guidance on software revenue
recognition. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2010; however, early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of
an entity’s fiscal year. Entities are required to adopt ASU 2009-13
and ASU 2009-14 concurrently. The Company is in the process of
determining the effect of the adoption of ASU 2009-14 and the impact, if any,
that it may have on its results of operations or financial
position.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06. The ASU amends ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures, to
add new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1
and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies
existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about
inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The
amendment is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales,
issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption will have
any impact on its results of operations or financial position.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following table sets forth certain items from the Company’s statements of
operations as a percentage of net revenue for the three fiscal years 2008
through 2010 (in percentages):
|
|
|
Fiscal
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net
revenue
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
Impairment
of intangibles
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
69.5 |
% |
|
|
56.3 |
% |
|
|
75.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
and sales
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
Impairment
of goodwill
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
69.8 |
% |
|
|
132.8 |
% |
|
|
83.7 |
% |
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
(76.6 |
)% |
|
|
(8.6 |
)% |
|
Other
income (expense)
|
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
(3.2 |
)% |
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(98.5 |
)% |
|
|
(4.2 |
)% |
Net
Revenue
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company reclassified certain revenue
segment information in prior period financial tables to conform to the
reorganization of the Company’s reportable business segments. For
additional information, see Note 6, “Significant Customer Information, Segment
Reporting and Geographic Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Annual Report. The revenue reclassifications had no
effect on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of
operations, consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity and comprehensive
income (loss) and consolidated statements of cash flows for the prior periods
presented.
The
following table is a comparison of net revenues by segment based on the current
reportable business segments (in thousands other than percentages):
|
|
|
Years
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
to 2009
|
|
|
2009
to 2008
|
|
|
Net
Revenue
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
Roxio
Consumer Products
|
|
$ |
90,077 |
|
|
$ |
104,074 |
|
|
$ |
122,691 |
|
|
$ |
(13,997 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
$ |
(18,617 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
Premium
Content
|
|
|
14,268 |
|
|
|
15,884 |
|
|
|
10,183 |
|
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
Total
net revenue
|
|
$ |
104,345 |
|
|
$ |
119,958 |
|
|
$ |
132,874 |
|
|
$ |
(15,613 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
$ |
(12,916 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
Net
revenue decreased by $15.6 million or 13% to $104.3 million for fiscal 2010,
from $120.0 million for fiscal 2009. The fiscal year 2010 decrease in
net revenue included a decrease of $14.0 million or 13% in Roxio Consumer
Products and a decrease of $1.6 million or 10% in Premium Content net
revenue. The Roxio Consumer Products segment experienced a $6.5
million reduction in OEM bundling revenue due to changes in product mixes,
per-unit pricing pressure, and lower unit volumes, plus a $2.9 million reduction
in technology licensing revenue from PC manufacturers caused by fewer pre-paid
license renewals during fiscal year 2010. Also contributing to the
decrease within the Roxio Consumer Product segment revenue was a $2.3 million
reduction in volume licensing revenue and a $2.3 million reduction in sales
through the Company’s web store and retail channels as a result of global
economic weakness affecting corporate spending and consumer demand.
The
decrease in Premium Content net revenue included a $3.7 million reduction in
professional products revenue resulting from a $2.7 million professional
development arrangement in Japan during fiscal year 2009 for which there was no
corresponding amount during fiscal year 2010, along with the continued global
economic weakness affecting consumer demand and corporate
spending. Also contributing to the decrease in Premium Content
revenue was a $1.3 million reduction in technology licensing revenue from CE
manufacturers caused by fewer development contracts and license renewals during
fiscal year 2010. The decrease in Premium Content net revenue was
partially offset by $3.1 million generated through RoxioNow services and an
increase of $0.3 million in content revenue related to the timing of the
CinemaNow asset acquisition.
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Net
revenue decreased by $12.9 million or 10% to $120.0 million for fiscal year
2009, from $132.9 million for fiscal year 2008. The decrease in net
revenue included a decrease of $18.6 million or 15% in Roxio Consumer Product
revenues offset by an increase of $5.7 million or 56% in Premium Content
revenue. The Roxio Consumer Products segment included a $19.6 million
reduction in OEM bundling revenue due to changes in product mixes, per-unit
pricing pressure, and lower unit volumes. The decrease in Roxio
Consumer Products net revenue was partially offset by $1.0 million generated
through volume licensing pursuant to a governmental contract.
Premium
Content net revenue increased due to a $3.3 million increase in professional
products revenue driven by a $2.7 million development contract recorded in
fiscal year 2009, for which there was no corresponding amount during fiscal year
2008. Also contributing to the increase in Premium Content revenue
was $1.3 million in technology licensing revenue from Qflix and CE manufacturers
under development contracts and license renewals during fiscal year
2009. Premium Content revenue also increased due to $0.9 million in
content revenue related to the timing of the CinemaNow asset acquisition and
$0.2 million generated through RoxioNow services.
Geographical
Revenue and Customer Concentration
The
following tables set forth a comparison of net revenues geographically (in
thousands other than percentages):
|
|
|
Fiscal
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
to 2009
|
|
|
2009
to 2008
|
|
|
Net
revenue
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
81,403 |
|
|
$ |
86,818 |
|
|
$ |
108,604 |
|
|
$ |
(5,415 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
$ |
(21,786 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
|
Export
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
)% |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
France
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
)% |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
Germany
|
|
|
2,721 |
|
|
|
4,429 |
|
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
|
(1,708 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
)% |
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
United
Kingdom
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
Europe:
Other
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
3,874 |
|
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
Japan
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
14,207 |
|
|
|
5,948 |
|
|
|
(6,486 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
)% |
|
|
8,259 |
|
|
|
139 |
% |
|
Singapore
|
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
209 |
% |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
285 |
% |
|
Other
Pacific Rim
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
)% |
|
Other
International
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
Total
net revenue
|
|
$ |
104,345 |
|
|
$ |
119,958 |
|
|
$ |
132,874 |
|
|
$ |
(15,613 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
$ |
(12,916 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
Domestic
sales accounted for $81.4 million, or 78%, of the Company’s net revenue in
fiscal year 2010, compared to $86.8 million or 72% of net revenue in fiscal year
2009. The decrease in domestic revenue included a reduction in OEM
bundling revenue of $4.7 million due to changes in product mixes, per-unit
pricing pressure, and lower unit volumes, as well as a $1.6 million reduction in
Qflix and technology licensing revenue from CE and PC manufacturers caused by
fewer development contracts and license renewals during fiscal year
2010. A $1.4 million reduction in volume licensing revenue, a $1.2
million reduction in sales through the Company’s web store, and a $0.8 reduction
in the professional channels as a result of global economic weakness affecting
corporate spending and consumer demand also contributed to the decrease in
domestic revenue. This decrease was partially offset by $3.1 million
generated through RoxioNow services, a $0.8 million increase in the retail
channel due to the sales of the Company’s Easy VHS to DVD product, and an
increase of $0.3 million in content revenue related to the timing of the
CinemaNow asset acquisition.
International
sales accounted for $22.9 million, or 22%, of the Company’s net revenue in
fiscal year 2010, compared to $33.1 million or 28% of its net revenue in fiscal
year 2009. The decrease in international sales partially resulted
from a $2.7 million professional development arrangement in Japan during fiscal
year 2009 for which there was no corresponding amount during fiscal year 2010, a
$2.6 million reduction in technology licensing revenue from PC manufacturers due
to one customer changing from a pre-paid to an “as-used” royalty contract, along
with the Company’s performance of fewer development contracts during fiscal year
2010. Also contributing to the decrease in international sales was a $1.0
million reduction in web service sales from a German-based web store reseller
upon the launch of the Company’s own online services offering.
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Domestic
sales accounted for $86.8 million, or 72%, of the Company’s net revenue in
fiscal year 2009, compared to $108.6 million or 82% of its net revenue in fiscal
year 2008. The decrease in domestic revenue included a reduction in
OEM bundling revenue of $22.4 million due to changes in product mixes, per-unit
pricing pressure, and lower unit volumes, a $2.6 million reduction in sales
through the Company’s web store and retail channels as a result of global
economic weakness affecting consumer demand, partly offset by sales of products
acquired as part of the Simple Star asset acquisition. This decrease
was partly offset by $1.4 million generated through volume licensing, $0.9
million in content revenue related to the timing of the CinemaNow asset
acquisition, and $0.8 in Qflix and technology licensing revenue from CE and PC
manufacturers caused by more development contracts and license
renewals.
International
sales accounted for $33.1 million, or 28%, of the Company’s net revenue in
fiscal year 2009, compared to $24.3 million or 18% of its net revenue in fiscal
year 2008. Japan revenue increased primarily due to a returns and
allowance charge of $2.0 million posted in the first quarter of fiscal 2008,
$2.7 million in fiscal year 2009 revenue from a professional development
arrangement for which there was no corresponding amount during fiscal year 2008,
along with an increase in technology licensing revenue from CE and PC
manufacturers caused by more development contracts and license
renewals. German revenue increased due to the use of a new web store
reseller upon the acquisition of the Simple Star assets.
Significant
Customers
The
following table reflects sales to significant customers as a percentage of total
net revenue and the related accounts receivable as a percentage of total
receivables:
|
|
|
Percent
of Total Net Revenue
|
|
|
Percent
of Total Accounts
Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Fiscal
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Customer
Name
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Digital
River
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
Navarre
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
Dell
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
Hewlett-Packard
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Ingram
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
No other
customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenue for fiscal years
2010, 2009 and 2008. The Company sells products to Dell and
Hewlett-Packard pursuant to individual supplements, exhibits or other
attachments that are appended to the standard terms and conditions the Company
has negotiated with each of these customers. These standard terms and
conditions include provisions relating to the delivery of the Company’s
products, the customer’s distribution of these products, representations by the
Company with respect to the quality of the products and the Company’s ownership
of the products, obligations by the Company to comply with law, confidentiality
obligations, and indemnification by the Company for breach of its
representations or obligations. The underlying agreements generally
renew for one year periods, subject to annual termination by either party or
termination for breach. Under each agreement, the OEM has the sole
discretion to decide whether to purchase any of the Company’s
products. The agreements are non-exclusive and do not contain any
minimum purchase obligations or similar commitments. The loss of
Dell, Hewlett-Packard, or any other major customer, would have a material
adverse effect on the Company, if it were unable to replace that
customer.
Revenue
recognized from Digital River was pursuant to a reseller arrangement, and
revenue recognized from Navarre was pursuant to distribution
arrangement. The Digital River agreement covers the electronic
delivery of Company software and the creation and maintenance of the shopping
cart process for the Company’s online stores; the Navarre agreement provides for
both physical and electronic delivery, and under both consignment and direct
sale models. The Company provides products to Digital River and
Navarre pursuant to agreements with standard terms and conditions including
provisions relating to the delivery of the Company’s products, distribution of
these products, representations by the Company with respect to the quality of
the products and the Company’s ownership of the products, obligations by the
Company to comply with law, confidentiality obligations, and indemnification by
the Company for breach of its representations or obligations. The
agreements generally renew for one-year periods, subject to annual termination
by either party as well as other termination provisions, such as termination for
breach. The agreements are non-exclusive and do not contain any
minimum purchase obligations or similar commitments.
It is
impracticable for the Company to report the net revenues by significant customer
per business segment for fiscal years ended March 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, as
some of the these customers may be in both segments.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of
revenue consists mainly of third party licensing expenses, employee salaries and
benefits for personnel directly involved in the production and support of
revenue-generating products and services, packaging and distribution costs, if
applicable, and amortization of acquired and internally-developed software and
intangible assets. In the case of consumer software distributed in
retail channels, cost of revenue also includes the cost of packaging, if any,
and certain distribution costs. The following table reflects cost of
revenue as a percentage of net revenue (in thousands other than
percentages):
|
|
|
Years
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
to 2009
|
|
|
2009
to 2008
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
Roxio
Consumer Products
|
|
$ |
23,572 |
|
|
$ |
27,994 |
|
|
$ |
29,239 |
|
|
$ |
(4,422 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
$ |
(1,245 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
Premium
Content
|
|
|
8,284 |
|
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
3,912 |
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
31,856 |
|
|
|
32,901 |
|
|
|
33,151 |
|
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
The
Company’s overall cost of revenue as a percentage of net revenue increased to
31% of net revenue for fiscal year 2010 from 27% for fiscal year
2009. Roxio Consumer Products cost of revenue as a percentage of
Roxio Consumer Products net revenue decreased to 26% for fiscal year 2010 from
27% for fiscal year 2009. The lower cost of revenue percentages were driven
by a 3% decrease in cost of revenue caused by lower purchased technology
amortization as a result of the $19.6 million impairment of intangibles recorded
in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. This was partly offset by a 2%
increase in cost of revenue resulting from higher product costs, which included
changes in retail packaging, along with bundling certain promotional items with
the Company’s products.
Premium
Content cost of revenue as a percentage of Premium Content net revenue increased
to 58% for fiscal year 2010 from 31% for fiscal year 2009. The increase was
due to $4.4 million additional operational, royalty, and content costs
associated with the acquired CinemaNow business. This increase was
partially offset by $0.8 million in lower professional costs in royalties,
product costs, technical support, and operations due to the Company’s
restructuring activities and lower sales. Development costs also decreased
$0.3 million due to the Company’s performance of fewer development contracts
during fiscal year 2010.
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
The
Company’s overall cost of revenue as a percentage of net revenue increased to
27% of net revenue for fiscal year 2009 from 25% for fiscal year
2008. Roxio Consumer products cost of revenues as a percentage of net
revenue increased to 27% for fiscal year 2009 from 24% for fiscal year
2008. The increase in cost of revenue percentages included a 3%
increase in costs of revenue resulting from higher product costs and royalties,
which was driven by changes in retail packaging, along with bundling certain
promotional items with the Company’s products and adding additional features in
the software.
Premium
Content cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 31% for
fiscal year 2009 from 38% for fiscal year 2008. The decrease in cost
of revenue percentages were driven by a 6% reduction in technical support costs
as a result of the Company’s restructuring activities.
Marketing
and Sales
Marketing
and sales expenses include salaries, benefits, sales commissions and share-based
compensation expense for marketing and sales employees, promotions and incentive
programs aimed to generate revenue such as advertising, trade shows, travel
related costs, and facility costs related to marketing and sales
personnel. The following table reflects the Company’s marketing and
sales operating expenses (in thousands other than percentages):
|
|
|
Years
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
to 2009
|
|
|
2009
to 2008
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Marketing
and sales
|
|
$ |
29,975 |
|
|
$ |
35,810 |
|
|
$ |
36,186 |
|
|
$ |
(5,835 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
$ |
(376 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
Percentage
of net revenue
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
Marketing
and sales expenses decreased by 16% to $30.0 million for fiscal year
2010, from $35.8 million for fiscal year 2009. As a percentage
of net revenue, marketing and sales expenses represented 29% and 30% of net
revenue for fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in
marketing and sales expenses for fiscal 2010 of $5.8 million, as compared to the
same period in the prior year, is due to the restructuring activities
implemented during fiscal 2009 and the first quarter of fiscal 2010 related to
headcount reductions and office closures and downsizing, as well as ongoing cost
containment efforts. The decreases experienced during fiscal 2010
compared to the prior year reflect a reduction in personnel related expenses of
$3.5 million, a reduction in outside services of $1.0 million, a reduction in
travel and entertainment expenses of $0.7 million, and a reduction in
advertising and promotional expenses of $1.7 million, which reductions were
partially offset by a $1.1 million non-recurring increase in promotional expense
as a result of the issuance of a warrant during the fiscal quarter ending
December 31, 2009.
On
October 29, 2009, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 668,711 shares of its
common stock to a third party in connection with the entry of the Company and
the third party into a strategic relationship agreement. Under the
terms of the warrant, which vested 50% upon execution on of the strategic
relationship agreement, 25% upon the first anniversary and 25% upon the second
anniversary, the holder is entitled to purchase shares of the Company’s common
stock at $4.98 per share (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the
date of the warrant issuance). During the three months ended December
31, 2009, the Company recorded the value representing the initial 50% vesting of
the warrant, to equity and a promotional expense within Marketing and Sales
operating expense. At the time of signing, no revenue had been earned
from the contract. The Company valued this portion of the warrant at
$1.1 million using the Black Scholes valuation model at the time of the signing
of the agreement. The Black-Scholes valuation assumptions included an
expected term of 5 years, volatility of 80.20%, and a risk free rate of
2.44%.
The
remaining 50% of the warrant subject to vesting will be remeasured at each
reporting period until vested and recognized ratably over the associated vesting
period of the warrant with the related expense recorded as contra
revenue. At March 31, 2010, the Company valued the unvested portion
of the warrant at $1.6 million using the Black Scholes valuation model and
recorded $0.7 million against revenue during fiscal year 2010. The
Black-Scholes valuation assumptions included an expected term of 4.6 years,
volatility of 84.83%, and a risk free rate of 2.31%.
Sales and
marketing headcount decreased to 99 at March 31, 2010 from 102 at March 31,
2009. The Company expects to continue to invest in marketing and
sales of its products and services to develop market opportunities and promote
its offerings while continuing to monitor its needs to reduce operating expenses
to align with the Company’s financial condition.
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Marketing
and sales expenses decreased by 1% to $35.8 million for fiscal year 2009, from
$36.2 million for fiscal year 2008. As a percentage of net revenue,
marketing and sales expenses represented 30% and 27% of net revenue for fiscal
years 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in marketing and
sales expenses for fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, is due to the
restructuring activities implemented during fiscal 2009 related to headcount
reductions and office closures and downsizing, as well as ongoing cost
containment efforts. The decrease in marketing and sales expenses for
the fiscal year ended 2009 of $0.4 million, as compared to fiscal 2008, reflects
a reduction in personnel related expenses of $1.2 million and a reduction in
travel and entertainment of $0.4 million. These decreases were in part
offset by a $1.0 million increase in advertising and promotions along with an
increase in outside services of $0.2 million during fiscal 2009 as compared to
fiscal 2008. The decrease in personnel related expenses and travel and
entertainment in fiscal 2009 resulted from the Company’s cost containment
efforts, including the restructuring activities implemented during fiscal 2009.
The increase in advertising and promotion, as well as outside services,
were attributable to an overall increase of targeted spending on broadcast
creative production, OEM brand marketing, market research, and packaging
development related to the launch of Toast during fiscal 2009. Sales
and marketing headcount decreased to 102 at March 31, 2009 from 127 at March 31,
2008.
Research
and Development
Research
and development expenses include salaries, benefits, share-based compensation
expenses for engineers, contracted development efforts, facility costs related
to engineering personnel, and expenses associated with equipment used for
development. The following table reflects the Company’s research and
development operating expenses (in thousands other than
percentages):
|
|
|
Years
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
to 2009
|
|
|
2009
to 2008
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
$ |
24,696 |
|
|
$ |
39,250 |
|
|
$ |
44,511 |
|
|
$ |
(14,554 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
)% |
|
$ |
(5,261 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
Percentage
of net revenue
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
Research
and development expenses decreased by 37% to $24.7 million for fiscal year
2010, from $39.3 million for fiscal 2009. As a percentage of net
revenue, research and development expenses represented 24% and 33% of net
revenue for fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease
for fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was a result of the Company’s cost
containment efforts, including the restructuring activities implemented during
fiscal 2009 and the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The $14.6 million
decrease for the fiscal year ended 2010 compared to fiscal 2009, includes a
reduction in personnel related expenses of $11.0 million, a reduction in
facility costs of $1.3 million, a reduction in travel and entertainment expenses
of $0.8 million, a reduction in outside services of $0.7 million, and a
reduction in associated research and development costs of $0.7
million. Research and development headcount decreased to 290 at March
31, 2010 from 314 at March 31, 2009. The Company expects research and
development costs to remain consistent as a percentage of net revenue during
fiscal 2011.
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Research
and development expenses decreased by 12% to $39.3 million for fiscal year 2009,
from $44.5 million for fiscal year 2008. Research and development
expenses represented 33% and 34% of net revenue for fiscal years 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The decrease in research and development expense of
$5.3 million during fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was due to lower
personnel-related costs of $4.4 million, and a reduction in associated research
and development costs of $0.9 million. These decreases were a result
of the Company’s restructuring activities. Research and development
headcount decreased to 314 at March 31, 2009 from 446 at March 31,
2008.
General
and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses include salaries, benefits, share-based
compensation, outside consulting services, travel expenses, legal costs
including loss contingency reserves, facility costs for finance, facilities,
human resources, legal, information services and executive
personnel. The following table reflects the Company’s general and
administrative operating expenses (in thousands other than
percentages):
|
|
|
Years
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
to 2009
|
|
|
2009
to 2008
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
$ |
17,669 |
|
|
$ |
24,160 |
|
|
$ |
27,310 |
|
|
$ |
(6,491 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
)% |
|
$ |
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
Percentage
of net revenue
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
General
and administrative expenses decreased by 27% to $17.7 million for fiscal year
2010, from $24.2 million for fiscal year 2009. As a percentage
of net revenue, general and administrative expenses represented 17% and 20% of
net revenue for fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
decrease for fiscal 2010 of $6.5 million, as compared to fiscal 2009, was a
result of the following factors: (1) the Company’s cost containment
efforts, including the restructuring activities implemented during fiscal 2009
and the first quarter of fiscal 2010, which contributed to a reduction in
personnel related expenses of $2.4 million and a decrease of $1.2 million in
general and administrative expenses such as travel, office supplies, and
depreciation; (2) a reversal of penalties and interest in the amount of $1.4
million as a result of an abatement related to payroll taxes associated with the
Company’s voluntary stock option review; (3) the absence of stock option review
expenses as compared to $0.5 million in fiscal year 2009; (4) a decrease in loss
contingency reserves related to legal settlements of $0.7 million; and (5) a
reduction in outside service fees of $0.3 million
General
and administrative headcount remained relatively constant between March 31, 2010
and March 31, 2009. Headcount was 101 at March 31, 2010 compared to
102 at March 31, 2009. The Company expects general and administrative
expenses will remain consistent as a percentage of net revenue during fiscal
2011.
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
General
and administrative expenses decreased 12% to $24.2 million for fiscal year 2009,
from $27.3 million for fiscal year 2008. General and administrative
expenses represented 20% and 21% of net revenue for fiscal years 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The decrease in general and administrative expense of
$3.2 during fiscal 2009, as compared to the prior year, was due to a decrease of
stock option review expenses of $7.6 million for fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal
2008. The Company completed its voluntary review of historical stock
option grant practices and related accounting by late fiscal 2008. The
decrease in stock option review expenses was partially offset by a loss
contingency reserve related to a legal settlement in the amount of $1.0 million
related to an ordinary course of business claim, an increase in personnel
related expenses of $1.1 million due to the hire of certain senior level
positions, an increase in share-based compensation expense of $0.8 million, and
an increase in rent expense of $1.0 million due to additions of new offices as a
result of acquisitions made during fiscal 2009 and the expansion of the
Company’s China office. Additionally, there was an increase in
penalties of approximately $0.5 million during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal
2008. In 2008, there was a reversal of penalties as a result of the
expiration of the statute of limitations related to payroll taxes associated
with the stock option review. There were no expirations in fiscal
2009.
General
and administrative headcount decreased to 102 at March 31, 2009 from 110 at
March 31, 2008.
Restructuring
Expense
Restructuring
expenses consist primarily of one-time termination benefits such as severance
and other employee related costs, contract termination costs related to facility
expenses, and other associated costs.
Restructuring
expense decreased 87% to $0.5 million for fiscal 2010, from $3.9 million for
fiscal 2009. The decrease in restructuring expenses for fiscal 2010
is due to the Company having completed several restructuring programs that it
had implemented during fiscal 2009. At each reporting period, the
Company evaluates its accruals for vacated facilities, exit costs and employee
separation costs to ensure the accruals are still appropriate. During
the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adjusted its accrual by $0.3
million due to changes in its estimates regarding applicable office subleasing
markets and made minor adjustments during the second and third quarters of
fiscal 2010 to its estimates related to one-time termination benefits, resulting
in a non-material decrease in overall restructuring expenses.
Restructuring
expense increased 25% to $3.9 million for fiscal year 2009, from $3.2 million
for fiscal year 2008. The increase in restructuring expenses for
fiscal year 2009 was primarily due to the Company engaging in several
restructuring programs during fiscal year 2009. Restructuring
expenses incurred for fiscal year 2008 consisted primarily of expenses
associated with the closure of the Company’s Richmond Hill Canada office
facility in December 2007.
Interest
Income, Interest Expense, and Other Expenses, Net
Interest
income was approximately $75 thousand, $0.7 million and $2.8 million for fiscal
years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decline in interest
income is related to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents held by the Company
prior to the receipt of net cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock on
December 16, 2009, as well as lower interest rates.
Interest
expense was approximately $0.1 million, $0.8 million and $1.5 million for fiscal
years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest expense during
fiscal 2010 relates to the finalization of a California sales tax audit while
the decrease in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008 was due to the repayment
of the Company’s Union Bank of California credit facility during fiscal
2009
Other
expenses for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 included foreign currency
transaction gains and losses.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
provision for income tax represents taxes payable in certain domestic and
foreign jurisdictions. Income tax provision was $0.5 million in
fiscal 2010. The fiscal year 2010 tax provision is related to taxes
on profitable foreign subsidiaries and state franchise
taxes. Generally, the Company’s effective tax rate differs from the
statutory rates because it has recorded approximately 100% valuation allowance
related to its deferred tax assets as the Company does not consider the
generation of taxable income to realize their tax benefits to be more likely
than not.
The
Company recorded an income tax provision in the amount of $25.2 million in
fiscal year 2009 and an income tax benefit of $4.3 million in fiscal year
2008. ASC 740-10 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits
of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to
be sustained by the taxing authority. Upon adoption of ASC 740-10,
the Company recorded cumulative adjustments to the beginning balances of
additional paid-in capital of $0.8 million, accumulated deficit of $0.6 million
and goodwill of $0.1 million. At March 31, 2008, the Company had $4.9
million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, $2.0 million of which would affect
its effective tax rate if recognized. The Company recognized $0.1
million of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income
tax expense for fiscal 2008.
Impairment
of Goodwill and Intangibles
No
goodwill or intangible impairments were recorded in fiscal 2010. The
Company recorded an impairment of goodwill and intangibles of $56.2 million and
$19.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 related to the Roxio Consumer
reporting unit based on a preliminary impairment analysis. The
Company finalized the impairment analysis in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009
and determined there was no further impairment. The carrying value of
goodwill is based on fair value estimates on projected financial information
which management believes to be reasonable. The valuation methodology used
to estimate the fair value of the Company and its reporting units considers the
market capitalization of the Company, requires inputs and assumptions that
reflect market conditions as well as management judgment.
Acquisitions
The
Company did not complete or enter into any acquisitions during fiscal
2010. The following acquisitions occurred during fiscal 2009 and
2008:
uMedia
Digital Technology Corporation
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement with uMedia Digital Technology Corporation (“uMedia”), a Chinese
software development company, whereby it acquired substantially all of the
assets for a purchase price of approximately $0.5 million. In
connection with the acquisition, the Company acquired seven
employees. uMedia’s expertise lies in developing video and audio
compression and decompression technology, which has now been incorporated into
the Company’s core audio and video technology.
Simple
Star Acquisition
During
the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement to purchase certain assets from Simple Star, Inc. (“Simple
Star”). These assets included PhotoShow, a multimedia storytelling
platform and online community that enables consumers to turn photos and video
clips into shows that can be viewed and shared on PCs, TVs, and handheld
devices, or published to social media sites on the Internet. In
connection with the acquisition, the Company acquired 25
employees. The Simple Star purchase price of approximately $6.0
million consisted of $5.0 million in cash due upon closing and $1.0 million plus
accrued interest due on the first anniversary of closing. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company paid the acquisition hold back of $1.0
million.
CinemaNow
Acquisition
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement to purchase certain assets and liabilities from CinemaNow, Inc.,
(“CinemaNow”) a digital video distributor. The CinemaNow assets,
which now form part of the RoxioNow Service, facilitate digital distribution of
premium video content, including Hollywood movies, TV shows, and music videos,
to users across multiple platforms. The CinemaNow purchase price of
approximately $3.2 million was comprised of approximately $0.9 million in cash,
assumed liabilities not to exceed $1.7 million, $0.2 million in direct costs and
$0.5 million for a general holdback payable 180 days after the
closing. The Company hired approximately 30 former CinemaNow
employees as a result of the acquisition. During the third quarter of
fiscal 2010, the Company settled its obligation to pay the $0.5 million
acquisition holdback.
Proposed
DivX Acquisition
In
addition to the completed acquisitions, on June 1, 2010, the Company executed a
Merger Agreement with DivX, as described above under Item I, Business –
“Proposed Acquisition of DivX.” The Company currently expects to
close the DivX Acquisition in September 2010, subject to the conditions
described above. The Merger Agreement does not contain a condition
that allows the Company not to close if it does not obtain financing, as the
Company expects to finance the cash portion of the consideration for the DivX
Acquisition from the financial resources of DivX. As of March 31,
2010, the Company had not incurred any significant expenses in connection with
the DivX Acquisition. The Company has incurred substantial expenses
since such date and expects to incur additional expenses before the expected
closing exclusive of any costs relating to integration of DivX
operations.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash
and Cash Equivalents (in thousands other than percentages):
|
|
|
Fiscal
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
to 2009
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Inc
(Dec)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$ |
39,439 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
38,143 |
|
|
|
2943 |
% |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
54,536 |
|
|
$ |
19,864 |
|
|
$ |
34,672 |
|
|
|
175 |
% |
Working
capital increased $38.1 million for fiscal 2010, from $1.3 million at the end of
fiscal 2009. The increase in working capital in fiscal 2010 was
primarily due to an increase in cash balances. Cash and cash
equivalents consist of cash and money market funds. Cash and cash
equivalents increased by $34.7 million or 175% for fiscal 2010 compared, from
$19.9 at the end of fiscal 2009. The increase in working capital
includes an increase in net cash proceeds from a public offering. On
December 16, 2009, the Company issued 3,450,000 shares of common stock in an
underwritten public offering at a per-share public offering price of
$9.70. The Company received approximately $31.4 million in net cash
proceeds after underwriting discounts, commissions and offering
expenses. The following table summarizes cash inflows and/or outflows
by category (in thousands other than percentages):
|
|
|
Fiscal
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
to 2009
|
|
|
2009
to 2008
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Inc
(Dec)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Inc
(Dec)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
4,623 |
|
|
$ |
(15,178 |
) |
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
$ |
19,801 |
|
|
|
(130 |
)% |
|
$ |
(16,466 |
) |
|
|
(1278 |
)% |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$ |
(2,123 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,019 |
) |
|
$ |
43,168 |
|
|
$ |
5,896 |
|
|
|
(74 |
)% |
|
$ |
(51,187 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
)% |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$ |
32,733 |
|
|
$ |
(19,866 |
) |
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
$ |
52,599 |
|
|
|
(265 |
)% |
|
$ |
(20,434 |
) |
|
|
(3598 |
)% |
Net cash
provided by operating activities was $4.6 million for fiscal 2010 compared to
net cash used in operating activities of $15.2 million for the fiscal year
2009. The significant increase in net cash flows from operating
activities during fiscal year 2010 compared to fiscal year 2009 is due to the
improvement from a $42.3 million net loss, excluding non-cash impairments of
intangible assets of $19.6 million and $56.2 million for goodwill, for fiscal
2009 to a $1.2 million net loss for fiscal 2010. The overall
improvement in operating income is largely due to the Company’s efforts to
reduce operating expenses to align expenditures with reduced
revenues.
Net cash
used in operating activities was $15.2 million for fiscal 2009 compared to net
cash provided by operating activities of $1.3 million for the fiscal year ended
2008. The $15.2 million increase in net cash used in operating
activities was primarily attributable to a decline in net revenues and the
payment of restructuring costs as further described above in “Results of
Operations.”
Net cash
used in investing activities was $2.1 million for fiscal 2010 compared to net
cash used in investing activities of $8.0 million for the fiscal year
2009. Net cash used during fiscal 2009 was higher due to the
Company’s acquisitions of Simple Star and CinemaNow assets during that period;
no comparable acquisitions occurred during fiscal 2010.
Net cash
used in investing activities was $8.0 million for fiscal 2009 compared to net
cash provided by investing activities of $43.2 million for the fiscal
year 2008. The $51.2 million change was primarily attributable
to a decline in net redemptions of short-term investments. In fiscal
year 2008, the Company redeemed $46.2 million, net, in short-term investments
compared to $1.1 million in fiscal year 2009. The acquisitions of
Simple Star for $5.0 million and CinemaNow for $2.6 million also contributed to
the decline in net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2009 as compared
to fiscal 2008.
Net cash
provided by financing activities was $32.7 million for fiscal 2010 compared to
net cash used in financing activities of $19.9 million for the fiscal year
2009. The increase is attributable to the Company’s offering and sale
of 3,450,000 shares of its common stock during the third quarter of fiscal
2010. The Company recorded net proceeds (after deducting the
underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses) of $31.4
million. The
shares of common stock were offered and sold pursuant to a base prospectus and
related prospectus supplement, which have been filed with the
SEC.
Net cash
used in financing activities was $19.9 million in fiscal year 2009 compared to
net cash provided by financing activities of $0.6 million for fiscal year ended
2008. The $20.5 million increase in net cash used by financing
activities was primarily attributable to the repayment of the $20 million
balance on the Company’s Union Bank of California credit facility paid in full
on September 29, 2008.
The
Company believes its cash balances and cash flows generated by operations will
be sufficient to satisfy its anticipated cash needs for working capital and
capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. The Company
expects that its actions to reduce operating expenses will allow it to generate
operating cash flows sufficient to sustain operations, and to offset, in whole
or in part, the potential impact of a decrease in future
revenues. However, the Company may require additional cash to fund
acquisitions or investment opportunities. In these instances, the
Company may seek to raise such additional funds through public, private equity,
debt financing, or from other sources. The Company may not be able to
obtain adequate or favorable financing at that time. Any equity
financing the Company may obtain may dilute existing ownership interests and any
debt financing could contain covenants that impose limitations on the conduct of
its business.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The
following table summarizes the Company’s known contractual obligations to make
future payments at March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
Due by Period
|
|
|
Contractual
Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less
Than 1
Year
|
|
|
2
Years
|
|
|
3-5
Years
|
|
|
More
Than 5
Years
|
|
|
Operating
and capital leases (1)
|
|
$ |
6,466 |
|
|
$ |
4,159 |
|
|
$ |
1,868 |
|
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Purchase
obligations (2)
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,516 |
|
|
$ |
4,709 |
|
|
$ |
2,368 |
|
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
(1)
|
Operating
and capital leases include the Company’s rent obligations on its leased
facilities and copiers.
|
|
|
(2)
|
For
the purposes of this table, purchase obligations for the purchase of goods
or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable, non-cancelable
and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including:
fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable
price provisions; and the approximate timing of the
transaction. The expected timing of payment of the obligations
discussed above was estimated based on information available as of March
31, 2010. Timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be
different depending on the time of receipt of goods or services or changes
to agreed-upon amounts for some
obligations.
|
The
Company may be required to make significant cash outlays related to its
unrecognized tax benefits (“UTBs”). However, due to the uncertainty of the
timing of future cash flows associated with its UTBs, the Company is unable to
make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement, if any,
with the respective taxing authorities. As such, UTBs of $6.0 million
at March 31, 2010 have been excluded from the contractual obligations table
above. For further information related to UTBs, see Note 5, “Income
Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual
Report.
The
Company sells its software licenses and services to its customers under software
license agreements. Each software license agreement contains the
relevant terms of the contractual arrangement with the customer, and generally
includes provisions that address indemnification of the customer against losses,
expenses, and liabilities from damages that may be awarded against the customer
in the event the Company’s software is found to infringe upon a third-party
patent, copyright, trademark, or other proprietary right. The
Company’s standard software license agreement generally limits the scope of and
remedies for such indemnification obligations in a variety of industry-standard
respects, including, but not limited to, certain time and geography-based scope
limitations, limits on aggregate liability, and a right to replace an infringing
product.
The
Company believes its internal development processes and other policies and
practices limit its exposure related to the indemnification provisions of the
software license agreements. To date, the Company has not had to
reimburse any of its customers for any losses related to these indemnification
provisions and is not aware of any material claims.
Concentration
of Credit Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
ASC
825-10, Disclosure of
Information about Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk and
Financial Instruments with Concentrations of Credit Risk, requires
disclosure of any significant off-balance-sheet and credit risk
concentrations. Financial instruments that potentially subject the
Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash
equivalent and accounts receivable. The Company does not have any
credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, option contracts or other
hedging arrangements. The Company maintains its cash, cash
equivalents balances with highly rated credit institutions. Although
the Company tries to limit the amount of credit exposure with any one financial
institution, it does in the normal course of business maintain cash balances in
excess of federally insured limits.
The
Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as such term is
defined by applicable SEC rules, that have or are reasonably likely to have a
current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
The
Company’s results of operations are subject to both currency transaction risk
and currency translation risk, which risks may be material with respect to
certain currencies. The Company incurs currency transaction risk when
it enters into either a purchase or sale transaction using a currency other than
its functional currency. With respect to currency translation risk, the
Company’s financial condition and results of operations are measured and
recorded in the relevant domestic currency then translated into U.S. dollars at
the balance sheet date for inclusion in its consolidated financial
statements.
The
Company held cash and cash equivalents denominated in Euros that amounted to
approximately €2.2 million (U.S. $2.9 million) at each of March 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2009. Due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in fiscal
2010, the currency rate increase of the Euro from March 31, 2009 to March 31,
2010 was 1.9%. One hundred Euro was equal to approximately $135
at March 31, 2010; $143 at December 31, 2009; $146 at September 30, 2009; $140
at June 30, 2009; and $132 at March 31, 2009. A hypothetical 10%
increase or decrease in the U.S. dollar versus the Euro as of March 31, 2010
would have resulted in an approximately $0.3 million change in the Company’s net
revenues during fiscal 2010.
The
Company held cash and cash equivalents denominated in Great Britain Pounds
Sterling (“GBP”) that amounted to approximately £0.6 million (U.S. $1.0 million)
at March 31, 2010, compared to approximately £0.7 million (U.S. $0.9
million) at March 31, 2009. Due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar
in fiscal 2010, the currency rate increase of the GBP from March 31, 2009 to
March 31, 2010 was 6%. One hundred GBP was equal to
approximately $151 at March 31, 2010; $159 at December 31, 2009; $159 at
September 30, 2009; $1.65 at June 30, 2009; and $142 at March 31,
2009. A hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in the U.S. dollar
versus the GBP as of March 31, 2010 would have resulted in an approximately $0.2
million change in the Company’s net revenues during fiscal 2010.
The
Company held cash and cash equivalents denominated in Japanese Yen that amounted
to approximately ¥168 million (U.S. $1.8 million) at March 31, 2010, compared to
approximately ¥176 million (U.S. $1.7 million) at March 31,
2009. Due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in fiscal 2010, the
currency rate increase of the Japanese Yen from March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010
was 5.2%. One hundred Japanese Yen was equal to approximately $1.08
at March 31, 2010; $1.08 at December 31, 2009; $1.11 at September 30, 2009;
$1.05 at June 30, 2009; and $1.03 at March 31, 2009. A hypothetical 10%
increase or decrease in the U.S. dollar versus the Japanese Yen as of March 31,
2010 would have resulted in an approximately $0.4 million change in the
Company’s net revenues during fiscal 2010.
The
Company’s market risk sensitive instruments were all entered into for
non-trading purposes. The Company does not engage in any hedging
activities and does not use derivatives or equity investments for cash
investment purposes.
Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The
reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
follow.
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The
Board of Directors and Shareholders, Sonic Solutions
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Sonic Solutions and
subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of March 31, 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash
flows for the year ended March 31, 2010. We also have audited the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2010, based
on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). Our audit also included the financial
statement schedule listed in the Index at Part IV, Item 15. The
Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and schedule,
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule and an opinion
on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of the financial statements included examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31,
2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended
March 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related
financial statement schedule for the year ended March 31, 2010, when considered
in relation to the consolidated financial statements as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein. Also in
our opinion, the Company’s maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by COSO.
/s/
Armanino McKenna, LLP
San
Ramon, California
June 4,
2010
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board
of Directors and Shareholders of Sonic Solutions:
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Sonic Solutions and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows
for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2009. In
connection with our audits of the financial statements, we have also audited the
schedule listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated
financial statements and the schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements and the schedule based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Sonic Solutions and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2009 and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2009, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Also in
our opinion, the related schedule for 2009 and 2008, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP
San
Francisco, California
May 29,
2009
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SONIC
SOLUTIONS